Some economists view kennedy-jhonson tax cutof 1964, which radically reduced corporate and indivisual taxes, as impetus for substantial properity enjoyed by the uS in thr late 1960's and early 1970's
which of the following if true would weakent the claim that the tax cut of 1964 was an impetus for economic prosperity?
a) modernized, more productive factorie werr built in late 60' as a result of the funds available by tax cuts
b) improved economic condition in wetern europe an djapan resulted in substantial increas in demand fro uS
c) the tax cut of 64 contained regulations concerning tax shelters that promoted investors to transfer their avings to more economically productive investments..
d) personal incomes after tax rose in the yrs following 64.
e) in the late 60',unemployemnt was relatively llower compared to early 60's
OA is b...i need an explanation why it cant be E
any help would be appreciated
which of the following if true would weakent the claim that the tax cut of 1964 was an impetus for economic prosperity?
a) modernized, more productive factorie werr built in late 60' as a result of the funds available by tax cuts
b) improved economic condition in wetern europe an djapan resulted in substantial increas in demand fro uS
c) the tax cut of 64 contained regulations concerning tax shelters that promoted investors to transfer their avings to more economically productive investments..
d) personal incomes after tax rose in the yrs following 64.
e) in the late 60',unemployemnt was relatively llower compared to early 60's
OA is b...i need an explanation why it cant be E
any help would be appreciated
