BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR medium difficulty

Expert replies
by abhi75 » Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:56 pm
12. Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proportion of brand names promoted on television that viewers of the advertising can recall is slowly decreasing.
Fact 2: Television viewers recall commercials aired first or last in a cluster of consecutive commercials far better than they recall commercials aired somewhere in the middle.
Fact 2 would be most likely to contribute to an explanation of fact 1 if which of the following were also true?
(A) The average television viewer currently recalls fewer than half the brand names promoted in commercials he or she saw.
(B) The total time allotted to the average cluster of consecutive television commercials is decreasing.
(C) The average number of hours per day that people spend watching television is decreasing.
(D) The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing.
(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by marustern » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:46 pm
My vote would be E.

For me, the key word that jumps out in Fact 1 is 'proportion'. As fact 2 states, people are more likely to recall the first or last commercial in a cluster series. If advertising is becoming less effective (proportionally), then fact 2 play the part to suggest that the number of commercials in each cluster is increasing.

As a result, I like E.
Join the discussion

by timepass » Sat May 17, 2008 7:09 pm
well... would go with D
Adv is less effective
People can recollect just the first and last adv ..no middle pls..

So advertisers will try to put their adv in first or last in every cluster....
which means no of cluster wll increase...

close contender would be total time decrease but....which in vauguely mean reverse..so out..
Join the discussion

by kino » Wed May 21, 2008 12:33 am
iMo E
Join the discussion

by mim3 » Tue May 27, 2008 2:36 pm
I say E here.

If the proportion commercials not recalled to commercials recalled is decreasing and people can't recall the commercials in the middle of a cluster but they can recall the first or last commercial, the # of commercials in the middle must be increasing.

D- # clusters is increasing- not the # of middle commercials
E- # of commercials per cluster is increasing. Because there's only 1 first or last commercial, the # of middle commericials is increasing.
Join the discussion

by gmatinjuly » Wed May 28, 2008 7:38 am
More times a cluster is shown per hour more viewers will remember as more will be start/end addv.
Longer spells of a cluster/more adds in a cluster than distributing them across impliess less adds in start and end.
Hence E
Join the discussion

by shrikantv » Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:40 am
E for me too
Join the discussion

by wilderness » Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:09 am
its of course E.

imagine the extreme case that in the past there were only 2 commercials per cluster. So people would remember the first and the last i.e. in this case all commercials. (fact 2).

Now the cluster is longer today as in the past, lets say 10 commercials per cluster. people would not recall the 8 commercials in the middle (fact 2) and hence they would recall only 2 out of 10 (20%) instead of 100% as they did before. (fact1)
Join the discussion

by ss700 » Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:34 am
IMO D

The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing

People can recollect only First and last Ads
If the average number of clusters per hour increase... Duration of consecutive commercials decrease, which means number of first and last Ads increase

If this fact is true , it helps Fact2 to properly explain Fact1.
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Tue May 10, 2016 4:16 am
i totally agree with you. i think option E is the best
Join the discussion