BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR Manhattan -1

Expert replies
by ILULA08 » Wed Aug 12, 2009 5:11 am
Last January, in an attempt to lower the number of traffic fatalities, the state legislature passed its “Click It or Ticket” law. Under the new law, motorists can be pulled over and ticketed for not wearing their seat belts, even if an additional driving infraction has not been committed. Lawyers and citizens’ groups are already protesting the law, saying it unfairly infringes on the rights of the state’s drivers. Law enforcement groups counter these claims by stating that the new regulations will save countless additional lives.

Which of the following inferences is best supported by the passage above?

A) Prior to the “Click It or Ticket” law, motorists could not be stopped simply for not wearing a seat belt.

B) The “Click It or Ticket” law violates current search and seizure laws.

C) Laws similar to “Click It or Ticket” have effectively reduced traffic fatalities in a number of states.

D) The previous seatbelt laws were ineffective in saving lives.

E) Law enforcement groups, rather than citizens groups, should determine how to best ensure the safety of motorists
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: CR Manhattan -1

by shahdevine » Wed Aug 12, 2009 5:26 am
ILULA08 wrote:Last January, in an attempt to lower the number of traffic fatalities, the state legislature passed its “Click It or Ticket” law. Under the new law, motorists can be pulled over and ticketed for not wearing their seat belts, even if an additional driving infraction has not been committed. Lawyers and citizens’ groups are already protesting the law, saying it unfairly infringes on the rights of the state’s drivers. Law enforcement groups counter these claims by stating that the new regulations will save countless additional lives.

Which of the following inferences is best supported by the passage above?

A) Prior to the “Click It or Ticket” law, motorists could not be stopped simply for not wearing a seat belt.

B) The “Click It or Ticket” law violates current search and seizure laws.

C) Laws similar to “Click It or Ticket” have effectively reduced traffic fatalities in a number of states.

D) The previous seatbelt laws were ineffective in saving lives.

E) Law enforcement groups, rather than citizens groups, should determine how to best ensure the safety of motorists
I would go a.

"Under the new law, motorists can be pulled over and ticketed for not wearing their seat belts---even if no additional driving infraction has been committed" Inference is that since motorists under this new law can be pulled over for not wearing their seat belts, previously motorists could not be simply pulled over for not wearing their seatbelts.
Join the discussion

by riteshbindal » Wed Aug 12, 2009 5:58 am
A IMO
Join the discussion

by hmboy17 » Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:44 am
I will go with A.

pls post OA ?
Join the discussion

by ILULA08 » Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:56 pm
A is the OA
Join the discussion

by Eric77Gorm » Mon May 16, 2016 12:24 am
I'm going with A.
Join the discussion