BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR Legislators

Expert replies
by kevincanspain » Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:10 pm
Always be wary of conclusions based on the results of a sample or survey- ask yourself whether the opinions of regular patrons of the cinema are indicative of those of the public at large. Could it be that the general public is so turned off by wanton violence and licentiousness that it prefers to stay home and watch reruns of Leave it to Beaver?
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by diebeatsthegmat » Wed Sep 01, 2010 7:02 pm
Anee wrote:Several legislators claim that the public finds many current movies so violent
as to be morally offensive. However, these legislators have misrepresented
public opinion. In a survey conducted by a movie industry guild, only 17
percent of respondents thought that movies are overly violent, and only 3
percent found any recent movie morally offensive. These low percentages
are telling, because the respondents see far more current movies than does
the average moviegoer. The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that the
argument
A. attempts to undermine the legislators' credibility instead of addressing their
argument
B. bases its conclusion on subjective judgments rather than on an objective
criterion of moral offensiveness
C. fails to consider the possibility that violent movies increase the prevalence of
antisocial behavior
D. generalizes from a sample that is unlikely to be representative of public
sentiment
E. presumes, without providing justification, that the people surveyed based
their responses on a random sampling of movies

Please explain your answer
is D the answer>?
Join the discussion

by bvn » Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:46 pm
I think it's C

If the argument fails to consider the possibility that violent movies increase the prevalence of
antisocial behavior. Then the respondents prefer violence
Join the discussion

by rajesh.chaudhary » Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:04 am
A. attempts to undermine the legislators' credibility instead of addressing their
argument - argument does not mention anything about the credentials of the legislators. Hence, wrong.
B. bases its conclusion on subjective judgments rather than on an objective
criterion of moral offensiveness - this is out of context answer choice. The central focus of the argument is moral offensiveness, not its definition.
C. fails to consider the possibility that violent movies increase the prevalence of
antisocial behavior - Antisocial behavior is too broad a term for the argument.
D. generalizes from a sample that is unlikely to be representative of public
sentiment - this seems like the right answer choice. I would go with this one.
E. presumes, without providing justification, that the people surveyed based
their responses on a random sampling of movies - this requires understanding of concept of random sampling. This to me is irrelevant.
Join the discussion