BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR - Identify conclusion

Expert replies
by karthikpandian19 » Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:34 am
Many people who commission the building of their own home, in order to save money, do not opt to build homes that meet sustainability standards. However, such thinking is short-sighted: buildings which meet sustainability standards are far more energy efficient, generating lower electricity and gas bills, requiring fewer repairs, and consuming far less water.

The author is arguing that __________.


(A) The additional money spent to build sustainable homes will eventually result in a decrease in other costs to homeowners

(B) Higher utility bills and water consumption will discourage homeowners from building homes that do not meet sustainability standards

(C) Many homes that do not meet sustainability standards will eventually be replaced by homes that do

(D) Individuals who commission homes usually cannot afford to spend more on homes that meet sustainability standards

(E) Individuals will not save money by building non-sustainable homes because they will need expensive energy efficient appliances to lower energy costs
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Birottam Dutta » Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:32 am
A is the correct answer and is being suggested by the author.
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Sun Jul 01, 2012 8:39 pm
OA is A

We must identify the main conclusion of the argument.

The argument first states that some people choose to have homes built that do not meet certain standards because homes that meet the standards are more expensive. However, it then says that the more expensive homes generate lower bills. The correct answer is likely to mention both the higher upfront costs of sustainable homes and the long-term savings on utilities.

Choice A says that "spending additional money" leads to "a decrease in other costs to homeowners." Choice A incorporates both premises. Choice A is correct.

Choice B: Out of scope. The author never indicates whether the "higher utility bills" associated with homes that do not meet sustainability standards will "discourage" people from building them.

Choice C: Irrelevant. This argument is not about "replacing" one type of home with another in the long term. This does not summarize anything in the argument.

Choice D: Unsupported. While it is said that drivers commission non-sustainable homes to save money, there is no reason to assume that they "cannot afford" sustainable homes.

Choice E: Irrelevant. The author does not mention how owners of non-sustainable homes will "lower energy costs," or even whether they are motivated to do so. In addition, the argument makes no mention of "energy efficient appliances."



karthikpandian19 wrote:Many people who commission the building of their own home, in order to save money, do not opt to build homes that meet sustainability standards. However, such thinking is short-sighted: buildings which meet sustainability standards are far more energy efficient, generating lower electricity and gas bills, requiring fewer repairs, and consuming far less water.

The author is arguing that __________.


(A) The additional money spent to build sustainable homes will eventually result in a decrease in other costs to homeowners

(B) Higher utility bills and water consumption will discourage homeowners from building homes that do not meet sustainability standards

(C) Many homes that do not meet sustainability standards will eventually be replaced by homes that do

(D) Individuals who commission homes usually cannot afford to spend more on homes that meet sustainability standards

(E) Individuals will not save money by building non-sustainable homes because they will need expensive energy efficient appliances to lower energy costs
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Join the discussion