BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR hit rate

Expert replies
by gauravgundal » Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:20 am
I have a query regarding CR hit rate . I am taking almost 2 to 3 mins to solve the CR questions.Can you please suggest me ?How can I reduce this time to 1 or max. 2 mins.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by neoreaves » Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:47 pm
Yes you can. Identify what is taking so long. Is it the analysis ? Identifying the conclusion / premise and all ? Or is it relating the question type i.e strengthen, weaken question? ......The more familiar you are with a question type, the faster you will get on that particular type ..Time how you are attacking the problem ...e.g analyzing the stem, looking at choices .....one thing I did to improve my speed was to start from choice A to E ...if i find a choice which I am 100% sure about why look at other choices ....this saves you fsome precious time ...but you have to be a 100% sure
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:04 pm
Received a PM asking me to reply.

neoreaves asks some great questions. Are you taking too long on ALL types of CR questions? (Too long = 2:30+) Or are there only certain categories that tend to be the "too long" categories?

Also, just FYI - you should aim to average 2m on CR, not use a max of 2m. For CR, the max is about 2m30s. Generally speaking, you should not be trying to answer a CR in only 1m; that kind of speed often leads to careless mistakes.

What have you been using so far to study CR? Do you know how to identify what kind of question you have? You identify the question type by reading the question itself - and you should read the question before you read the argument. Once you've read the question, you should already know (based on the question type):

(1) the kind of information you need to find
(2) the kind of analysis you need to do on that information
(3) characteristics of a correct answer for that type
(4) characteristics of wrong answers for that type

This is all BEFORE you've even read the argument itself. For example, as soon as I read a question and realize it's a "Draw a Conclusion" question, then I know I should identify any facts or opinions they give (but I should NOT find a conclusion in the argument), and I should understand exactly what the argument has told me versus what it might imply. The correct answer will be something that must be true according to the information given, without bringing in any outside knowledge or assumptions. Incorrect answers will often go "too far" by assuming additional information that we don't actually know.

Also, how many times do you re-read all or part of the argument? How many times do you look at each answer choice?
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by this_time_i_will » Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:29 pm
Thanks for the explanation stacey. I have one more question regarding the re-reading of argument stem. Do you think re-reading a stem some time is ok or should one should strive for comprehending in first reading itself. I know if one is able to understand in first reading then it saves time, but some time you just can't help it. I am facing this problem for some CRs. Do you think it is an area i need to urgently look at. Thanks for any suggestion.
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:42 am
If you don't comprehend something you read, then yes, you'll probably need to read it again. Just remember that you've got some specific goals in mind - you don't necessarily need to comprehend every last little bit. If you can tell what kind of question it is and, if applicable, what the conclusion is, then you're probably done with the question stem, even if you don't understand every last word sitting there or why it's sitting there.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion