Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

CR- gmatprep

Expert replies
by venmic » Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:05 pm
Can someone please explain the premise assumpttion and conclusion

couldnt really follow this[/img]
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by cans » Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:19 pm
Premise: from 1973 to 1976, c's consumption increased by 3.4%, sales of t rose 18% and total population: 5%
There is no assumption. and we have to find the conclusion / interference
A) nothing is mentioned about profit / prices. So we can't conclude
D) similar to A.
E) we just know that c's consumption and t's consumption increased. whether there was a switch or not, we don't know

C) first of all non-smokers.. does that include only c or only t or both.. ?
may initially only 1 person out of 1000,000 consumed c. then even if c's consumption increased by 3.4%, as population increases by 5%, proportion of non-smokers will increase

B) let 100 people and x people consumed c. then per capital consumption in 1973 = x/100
now 1.034x and 105 persons. thus per capital consumption in 1976 = 1.034x/105 = .98x/100
as this is less than x/100, thus B is true...
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion

by amit2k9 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:22 pm
'73 - smokers 100 tobacco 100 non smokers 100 total population 300
'76 - smoking 103.4 tobacco chewing 118 non smokers 115/or more total population 315

thus this clearly indicates that both smoking and T chewing has increased,while non smokers population has increased too.
B clearly fits in.

premise - statement mentioning the increase percentages for smoking,chewing and population.
conclusion - B.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Join the discussion