Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

CR_Gmat Prep

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by theCodeToGMAT » Thu May 08, 2014 1:44 am
According to question Stem, the coal per miner has doubled. Inorder to conclude that productivity has increased we need to make sure that the miners have not decreased.

Lets says 5 years ago.
Production = 1000
Miners = 10
Production per Miner = 100

5 Years Later
Production = 1000
Miners = 5
Production Per miner = 200

So, we need to make sure that Miners have remained constant.
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sat May 10, 2014 12:38 am
Hi mukherjee.tanuj3,

This inference question does not offer us much information to work with, so we have to be very careful about what we KNOW and what we DON'T KNOW.

The Facts:
-New technology is being used in Tribnia's coal industry (specifically in its coal mines).
-Coal output PER MINER, for all of Tribnia's coal industry, is double what it was 5 years ago.
-NO new mines have opened.

What we DON'T KNOW:
-How many mines there are.
-How many miners there are.
-How much mining any individual miner does.

We can use the above information to assess the answer choices:

Answers C, D and E can be quickly eliminated:
C because it involves a hypothetical that does not match the restrictions in the prompt.
D because it involves the output of any one individual miner, which we know nothing about.
E because it involves cost of coal, which is irrelevant.

Between A and B….
A says if the number of miners stays the same, then the total output has doubled. This MATCHES the above facts since coal output per miner has doubled. If the number of miners is the same, then the "doubling" would double the output.

B says any mine that had an increase had an increased output per miner. That is NOT necessarily true. If the mine hired additional miners, then the total output could have increased but the average per miner (for THAT mine) could have decreased.

Final Answer: A

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion