Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

CR-Damaged Nerves

Expert replies
by nitya34 » Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:38 pm
Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate themselves naturally, nor even under the spur of nerve-growth stimulants. The reason, recently discovered, is the presence of nerve-growth inhibitors in the spinal cord. Antibodies that deactivate those inhibitors have now been developed. Clearly, then, nerve repair will be a standard medical procedure in the foreseeable future.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the accuracy of the prediction above?

(A) Prevention of the regeneration of damaged nerves is merely a by-product of the main function in the human body of the substances inhibiting nerve growth.
(B) Certain nerve-growth stimulants have similar chemical structures to those of the antibodies against nerve-growth inhibitors.
(C) Nerves in the brain are similar to nerves in the spinal cord in their inability to regenerate themselves naturally.
(D) Researchers have been able to stimulate the growth of nerves not located in the spinal cord by using only nerve-growth stimulants.
(E) Deactivating the substances inhibiting nerve growth for an extended period would require a steady supply of antibodies

Need explanation
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: CR-Damaged Nerves

by piyush_nitt » Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:24 pm
nitya34 wrote:Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate themselves naturally, nor even under the spur of nerve-growth stimulants. The reason, recently discovered, is the presence of nerve-growth inhibitors in the spinal cord. Antibodies that deactivate those inhibitors have now been developed. Clearly, then, nerve repair will be a standard medical procedure in the foreseeable future.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the accuracy of the prediction above?

(A) Prevention of the regeneration of damaged nerves is merely a by-product of the main function in the human body of the substances inhibiting nerve growth.
(B) Certain nerve-growth stimulants have similar chemical structures to those of the antibodies against nerve-growth inhibitors.
(C) Nerves in the brain are similar to nerves in the spinal cord in their inability to regenerate themselves naturally.
(D) Researchers have been able to stimulate the growth of nerves not located in the spinal cord by using only nerve-growth stimulants.
(E) Deactivating the substances inhibiting nerve growth for an extended period would require a steady supply of antibodies

Need explanation
IMO A

Conclusion: nerve repair will be a standard medical procedure in near future and it will be possible due to the discovery of Antibodies that deactivate inhibitors in spinal cord.

Basically , we need to weaken the conclusion.

So what if , substance that responsible for the inhibition of growth of nerves actually performs more critical tasks/main functions in body and deactivation of the substances could lead to other disease/damages to body.

Hence it weakens the conclusion.

OA pls ?
Join the discussion

by S0laris » Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:27 am
OMO A - bc it says that drug-preventor prevents all nerves growth - means that desirable nerves growth would be prevented also.
we are the champions !
Join the discussion

by orel » Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:47 pm
conclusion does not say anything about prevention. It says that damaged nerve cells will be regenerated.

How about B? Nerve-growth stimulants and new antibodies have similar chemical structures. Since nerve-growth stimulants didn't help in regeneration, neither will new antibodies...

OA?
Join the discussion

by moorthy76 » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:48 pm
IMO A..... but it can be B ...

OA?
Best Regards,
Surya
Join the discussion

by S0laris » Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:18 pm
Feruza Matyakubova wrote:conclusion does not say anything about prevention. It says that damaged nerve cells will be regenerated.

How about B? Nerve-growth stimulants and new antibodies have similar chemical structures. Since nerve-growth stimulants didn't help in regeneration, neither will new antibodies...

OA?
similar chemical structure doesn't mean same effect in application
and it's given by stimulus that antibodies can restrict inhibitors' activities - vice versa isn't possible - this answer contradicts the premise
we are the champions !
Join the discussion

by S0laris » Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:24 pm
we are the champions !
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:12 pm
(A) Prevention of the regeneration of damaged nerves is merely a by-product of the main function in the human body of the substances inhibiting nerve growth.

If we assume that the "substances inhibiting nerve growth." have certain other main functions ... it doesn't say that the main function will be harmful to body.... So these can be implied as "a standard medical procedure"

(B) Certain nerve-growth stimulants have similar chemical structures to those of the antibodies against nerve-growth inhibitors. <- correct IMO

But use of certain doesn't imply that these are the same stimulants used in experiment...
Join the discussion

by nitya34 » Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:22 am
yes OA-A
sorry for the dalay :oops:
Join the discussion

by ashley.com » Sun May 15, 2016 2:40 am
I would go for A as well
Join the discussion