BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR bible - GDP trouble!!

Expert replies
by arora007 » Wed Feb 02, 2011 3:02 pm
In 1980, Country A had a per capita gross domestic product (GDP) that was $5,000 higher than that of the European Economic Community. By 1990, the difference, when adjusted for inflation, had increased to $6,000. Since a rising per capita GDP indicates a rising average standard of living, the average standard of living in Country A must have risen between 1980 and 1990.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Between 1980 and 1990, Country A and the European Economic Community experienced the same percentage increase in population.
(B) Between 1980 and 1990 the average standard of living in the European Economic Community fell.
(C) Some member countries of the European Economic Community had, during the 1980s, a higher average standard of living than Country A.
(D) The per capita GDP of the European Economic Community was not lower by more that $1,000 in 1990 than it had been in 1980.
(E) In 1990, no member country of the European Economic Community had a per capita GDP higher than that of Country A.

I have no clue why D is the answer. The explanation in the Bible seems to be too convoluted.

Plz help!!
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Night reader » Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:20 pm
arora007 wrote:In 1980, Country A had a per capita gross domestic product (GDP) that was $5,000 higher than that of the European Economic Community. By 1990, the difference, when adjusted for inflation, had increased to $6,000. Since a rising per capita GDP indicates a rising average standard of living, the average standard of living in Country A must have risen between 1980 and 1990.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Between 1980 and 1990, Country A and the European Economic Community experienced the same percentage increase in population.
(B) Between 1980 and 1990 the average standard of living in the European Economic Community fell.
(C) Some member countries of the European Economic Community had, during the 1980s, a higher average standard of living than Country A.
(D) The per capita GDP of the European Economic Community was not lower by more that $1,000 in 1990 than it had been in 1980.
(E) In 1990, no member country of the European Economic Community had a per capita GDP higher than that of Country A.

I have no clue why D is the answer. The explanation in the Bible seems to be too convoluted.

Plz help!!
I have answered D in around 3 min-s. But I agree the question is convoluted, as the increase of GDP in EU is said to be not lower - it can be higher too. The main assumption behind such increase is inflation adjustment rate --> because we have inflation and not deflation we must reduce (decrease) and we have the increase effect. The change in GDP of EU is the distracting factor here. The main assumption is inflation - decrease, and we see increase of GDP.
I chose D for it equals the increase changes +1000 EU and 6,000 Country A of both GDPs
Join the discussion

by prachich1987 » Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:47 pm
Even D is not the right answer here
Please go through below

https://www.beatthegmat.com/powerscore-c ... 73489.html
Thanks!
Prachi
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:13 am
prachich1987 wrote:Even D is not the right answer here
Please go through below

https://www.beatthegmat.com/powerscore-c ... 73489.html
Hi Answer has to be D
per capita Income of Country A in 1980 - per capita Income of European Community in 1980 =5000
Let the rise in per capita Income of Country A in 1990 be X
Let the rise in per capita Income of European Community in 1990 be Y
So In 1990
X + 5000 - Y = 6000
X - Y = 1000
X is greather than Y by 1000
If we negate D , the conclusion is destroyed
I went thru the thread u posted Even if X - Y =1000 The conclusion stands
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:18 am
bros if u dont understand x + 5000 then pls lemme know
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by arora007 » Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:31 am
mundasingh123 wrote:bros if u dont understand x + 5000 then pls lemme know
nai nai... $1000 to u!! Cheers!! its just that...the language is very convoluted... to convert into a formula is tough!
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Thu Feb 03, 2011 10:28 am
arora007 wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:bros if u dont understand x + 5000 then pls lemme know
nai nai... $1000 to u!! Cheers!! its just that...the language is very convoluted... to convert into a formula is tough!
The question requires application of Numbers.X has to be Positive because the conclusion says the Standard |Of Living Of A Increased
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion