BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR Assumption Question

Expert replies
by anniananth » Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:02 am
Please help me with the below assumption CR question. Please Provide your explanations for each answer option.

The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in
neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of
televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent statistics show a drop in the number of
television assemblers in Borodia. Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of
televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of
television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.

(B) Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have.

(C) The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not
decreased significantly during the past three years.

(D) The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past
three years.

(E) The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of
television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years.

Official answer after discussion. Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by stevemae » Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:00 am
(A) The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of
television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.

We don't know # of TV assemblers in V increased or decreased. incorrect

(B) Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have.

No evidence incorrect

(C) The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not
decreased significantly during the past three years.

Correct. If the ave. time of hours that a Borodian TV assembler increased, we can't conclude that # of TV produced by B decreased becasue less # of country B workers can make more TVs.


(D) The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years.

No clear evidence. incorrect



(E) The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of
television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years.

No clue. Incorrect
Join the discussion

by ArunangsuSahu » Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:10 am
Assumption Question...

Choice is (C)

if avg hour/assembling would have decrease then one assembler could have produced several other assembler's stuffs
Join the discussion

by chufus » Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:00 am
I think C is the correct answer. If the rate of assemblance had increased that could be one factor contributing to the decline of assemblers since lesser people will be required to assemble the television, provided the number of televisions required remains the same. Since this provides an alternate explanation for the decline in the number of assemblers (and a very plausible one at that), the argument has to assume that this is not the case. Therefore C
Join the discussion

by anniananth » Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:44 pm
The answer is C. Thanks for your plausible explanations.
Join the discussion