BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
CR argurment: Weak or Strong
Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning |
First of all, I didn't understand what is your question is and secondly you can expect weaken question on this passage
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Yes, can you please clarify what the question is. This looks like a stimulus, can you post the answer choices and what the actual question is.reply2spg wrote:First of all, I didn't understand what is your question is and secondly you can expect weaken question on this passage
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
This isn't a routine CR question with five answer choices. Otherwise i would surely have put in everything.
It is just CR passage. The question is to answer whether the reasoning used by the author of the passage is strong or weak.
I hope i have made things clear.
I wasn't convinced with the answer provided. So thought of discussing it in the forum.
Thanks.
It is just CR passage. The question is to answer whether the reasoning used by the author of the passage is strong or weak.
I hope i have made things clear.
I wasn't convinced with the answer provided. So thought of discussing it in the forum.
Thanks.
Sandy
IMO the argument is Strong. It is showing all the steps that help in plankton's existence on earth.sanp_l wrote:This isn't a routine CR question with five answer choices. Otherwise i would surely have put in everything.
It is just CR passage. The question is to answer whether the reasoning used by the author of the passage is strong or weak.
I hope i have made things clear.
I wasn't convinced with the answer provided. So thought of discussing it in the forum.
Thanks.
What does the explanation in the book say?
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Hi all!
Sandy, according to me the reasoning is weak and is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that
this cause-effect chain has many links and with each link, which is not deductively valid, the inductive leap increases.
And chain is no stronger than its weakest link. It is easier to find weak link in long cause-effect chain than in short one.
The conclusion is inductively weak.
I hope this sounds reasonable and is helpful.
Sandy, according to me the reasoning is weak and is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that
this cause-effect chain has many links and with each link, which is not deductively valid, the inductive leap increases.
And chain is no stronger than its weakest link. It is easier to find weak link in long cause-effect chain than in short one.
can we think of situation where cooler surface of the Earth does not benefit plankton?plankton cause the surface of the Earth to be cooler and this benefits the plankton
The conclusion is inductively weak.
I hope this sounds reasonable and is helpful.
"There is no greater wealth in a nation than that of being made up of learned citizens." Pope John Paul II
if you have any questions, send me a private message!
should you find this post useful, please click on "thanks" button
if you have any questions, send me a private message!
should you find this post useful, please click on "thanks" button
sanpl..
I remember this passage.This is one the passage in CR Bible.Right?
The argument in this passage is strong.Is provides the example of species altering the environment.
Altough it does not show highly evolved species alone exhibit this character,It shows it common among the species.
Can you please let us know ur doubt?
Note that in real GMAT u don't need to analyze every CR passage whether the argument is weak or strong.It's time consuming.From the question given[weaken/strengthen] and answer options you can identify the correct one.
I remember this passage.This is one the passage in CR Bible.Right?
The argument in this passage is strong.Is provides the example of species altering the environment.
Altough it does not show highly evolved species alone exhibit this character,It shows it common among the species.
Can you please let us know ur doubt?
Note that in real GMAT u don't need to analyze every CR passage whether the argument is weak or strong.It's time consuming.From the question given[weaken/strengthen] and answer options you can identify the correct one.
--Anand--
hahahaha what did you think when u post the CR?
where are alll the answer choices? you think everybody has the same book you are studying, duide? lol
post the answer choices!














