Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

CR - Argument using reverse causation

Expert replies
by karthikpandian19 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:25 am
A scientist found that sailors who get scurvy, a disease that affects the mucous membranes, tend to have lower concentrations of vitamin C in their blood than do those who do not develop scurvy. Based on this information, the scientist concluded that vitamin C protects against scurvy.

The scientist’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?


(A) A very high blood concentration of vitamin C protects against scurvy more effectively than does an average concentration of vitamin C in the blood.

(B) Treatment for vitamin deficiency cures scurvy.

(C) A sailor who has a low concentration of vitamin C in the blood is susceptible to many diseases affecting the mucous membranes.

(D) People with high concentrations of vitamin C in the blood cannot develop scurvy.

(E) Scurvy does not cause low concentrations of vitamin C in the blood.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:49 am
The correct answer is E. In order to determine whether the conclusion is true you need to answer the following question: Is scurvy the cause or the effect of the low concentration of vitamin C in blood?
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

• If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

• Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

• Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:00 pm
OA is E

A scientist finds that sailors who have scurvy usually also have low vitamin C concentrations in their blood. The scientist concludes that vitamin C prevents scurvy in sailors.

There is no mention of the amounts of vitamin C; the scientist doesn’t argue that more vitamin C means greater protection against scurvy in sailors, so choice A is not assumed.

Curing scurvy is different than preventing it; choice B is outside the scope of the argument.

Other diseases have nothing to do with preventing scurvy, so choice C is incorrect.

Choice D is too extreme; the scientist doesn't need to assume that high vitamin C levels prevent scurvy in absolutely every case.

Choice E is a valid assumption; a correlation between vitamin C and scurvy could mean two things; that scurvy affects vitamin C concentration in the blood, or that vitamin C concentration affects the likelihood of contracting scurvy. Since the scientist is stating that the second scenario is true, he is assuming that the first scenario, that contracting scurvy decreases vitamin C concentration, is not true.

Choice E is correct.
karthikpandian19 wrote:A scientist found that sailors who get scurvy, a disease that affects the mucous membranes, tend to have lower concentrations of vitamin C in their blood than do those who do not develop scurvy. Based on this information, the scientist concluded that vitamin C protects against scurvy.

The scientist’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?


(A) A very high blood concentration of vitamin C protects against scurvy more effectively than does an average concentration of vitamin C in the blood.

(B) Treatment for vitamin deficiency cures scurvy.

(C) A sailor who has a low concentration of vitamin C in the blood is susceptible to many diseases affecting the mucous membranes.

(D) People with high concentrations of vitamin C in the blood cannot develop scurvy.

(E) Scurvy does not cause low concentrations of vitamin C in the blood.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Join the discussion