BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR - Argument using reverse causation

Expert replies
by karthikpandian19 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:25 am
A scientist found that sailors who get scurvy, a disease that affects the mucous membranes, tend to have lower concentrations of vitamin C in their blood than do those who do not develop scurvy. Based on this information, the scientist concluded that vitamin C protects against scurvy.

The scientist's conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?


(A) A very high blood concentration of vitamin C protects against scurvy more effectively than does an average concentration of vitamin C in the blood.

(B) Treatment for vitamin deficiency cures scurvy.

(C) A sailor who has a low concentration of vitamin C in the blood is susceptible to many diseases affecting the mucous membranes.

(D) People with high concentrations of vitamin C in the blood cannot develop scurvy.

(E) Scurvy does not cause low concentrations of vitamin C in the blood.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:49 am
The correct answer is E. In order to determine whether the conclusion is true you need to answer the following question: Is scurvy the cause or the effect of the low concentration of vitamin C in blood?
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

"¢ If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

"¢ Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

"¢ Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:00 pm
OA is E

A scientist finds that sailors who have scurvy usually also have low vitamin C concentrations in their blood. The scientist concludes that vitamin C prevents scurvy in sailors.

There is no mention of the amounts of vitamin C; the scientist doesn't argue that more vitamin C means greater protection against scurvy in sailors, so choice A is not assumed.

Curing scurvy is different than preventing it; choice B is outside the scope of the argument.

Other diseases have nothing to do with preventing scurvy, so choice C is incorrect.

Choice D is too extreme; the scientist doesn't need to assume that high vitamin C levels prevent scurvy in absolutely every case.

Choice E is a valid assumption; a correlation between vitamin C and scurvy could mean two things; that scurvy affects vitamin C concentration in the blood, or that vitamin C concentration affects the likelihood of contracting scurvy. Since the scientist is stating that the second scenario is true, he is assuming that the first scenario, that contracting scurvy decreases vitamin C concentration, is not true.

Choice E is correct.
karthikpandian19 wrote:A scientist found that sailors who get scurvy, a disease that affects the mucous membranes, tend to have lower concentrations of vitamin C in their blood than do those who do not develop scurvy. Based on this information, the scientist concluded that vitamin C protects against scurvy.

The scientist's conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?


(A) A very high blood concentration of vitamin C protects against scurvy more effectively than does an average concentration of vitamin C in the blood.

(B) Treatment for vitamin deficiency cures scurvy.

(C) A sailor who has a low concentration of vitamin C in the blood is susceptible to many diseases affecting the mucous membranes.

(D) People with high concentrations of vitamin C in the blood cannot develop scurvy.

(E) Scurvy does not cause low concentrations of vitamin C in the blood.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Join the discussion