BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

County C

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 9 times
by kaulnikhil » Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:48 am
Last year County C created and filled more manufacturing jobs than it had in previous years. Given that County C has the smallest work force and an unemployment rate equal to that of other counties in the state, the increase in new jobs in County C is startling.

Which of the following statements correctly points out the error in the reasoning above?

A. If the state in which County C is located lost manufacturing jobs last year, then countyC's r record number of new jobs is unimportant to the health of the state.

B. The county is judged against its own record, so the comparisons between its workforce and unemployment rate and those of other counties is irrelevant.

C. The unemployment rate in County C for workers with certain skills was higher than that for others.

D. Since unemployment in all counties in the state, except County C, declined markedly in the past decade, it is not surprising that County C has a high unemployment rate.

E. Since County C has the smallest population of any county in the state, County C is expected to have the smallest workforce.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:47 pm
Thanked: 10 times

by Phirozz » Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:13 pm
kaulnikhil wrote:Last year County C created and filled more manufacturing jobs than it had in previous years. Given that County C has the smallest work force and an unemployment rate equal to that of other counties in the state, the increase in new jobs in County C is startling.

Which of the following statements correctly points out the error in the reasoning above?

A. If the state in which County C is located lost manufacturing jobs last year, then countyC's r record number of new jobs is unimportant to the health of the state.

B. The county is judged against its own record, so the comparisons between its workforce and unemployment rate and those of other counties is irrelevant.

C. The unemployment rate in County C for workers with certain skills was higher than that for others.

D. Since unemployment in all counties in the state, except County C, declined markedly in the past decade, it is not surprising that County C has a high unemployment rate.

E. Since County C has the smallest population of any county in the state, County C is expected to have the smallest workforce.
IMO B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:48 pm
Must be B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:09 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 1 times

by akahuja143 » Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:19 pm
IMO B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:33 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 47 times

by kstv » Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:30 pm
I 'll stick my neck out!
Please explain why B and not C.
Is my understanding, flawed ?
County C has created and filled more manufacturing jobs last year , say 2009.
C has the smallest workforce and unemployment rate = the average of the state.
Conclusion - The increase is startling. Why because if C created more jobs , its small workforce will be increasingly employed and lower the unemployment rate.
The unemployment rate is = (Number of unemployed / Total of the workforce) X 100
Total of workforce is assumed constant but small . The unemployment rate will go down with increase in employment and not be equal to other counties. Other counties did not create as much jobs.
Why is the comparison irrelevant ?
C) is possible cos' the Unemployment rate should have gone down but did not. because unemployment rate in County C for workers with certain skills was higher than that for others this affected the overall Unemplyment rate.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Tue Mar 23, 2010 3:22 am
That is right, I went for C as well. More or less the same logic as above
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:00 am
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:710

by Pdgmat2010 » Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:26 am
C makes sense by your logic above. but is this the OA?
i chose B out of mere frustration rather than carefully reasoning it like you guys did..
your expln has helped!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:47 pm
Thanked: 10 times

by Phirozz » Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:55 am
kstv wrote:I 'll stick my neck out!
Please explain why B and not C.
Is my understanding, flawed ?
County C has created and filled more manufacturing jobs last year , say 2009.
C has the smallest workforce and unemployment rate = the average of the state.
Conclusion - The increase is startling. Why because if C created more jobs , its small workforce will be increasingly employed and lower the unemployment rate.
The unemployment rate is = (Number of unemployed / Total of the workforce) X 100
Total of workforce is assumed constant but small . The unemployment rate will go down with increase in employment and not be equal to other counties. Other counties did not create as much jobs. Why is the comparison irrelevant ?
C) is possible cos' the Unemployment rate should have gone down but did not. because unemployment rate in County C for workers with certain skills was higher than that for others this affected the overall Unemplyment rate.
plz have a look at ur reasoning.. as per ur statement - Other counties did not create as much jobs ?????
Do we know about other countries ??
How can u assume that The unemployment rate in County C for workers with certain skills was higher than that for others ?? we cannot make assumption, we have to show flaw in in reasoning already provided rather than providing alternate solution.
Unless and until we know the base ie last yr's employment how can u say increase in county C is startling ? I mean we have to look at %age increase in jobs over the previous year.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 9 times

by kaulnikhil » Tue Mar 23, 2010 9:36 am
OA B
Guy who have answered B plz put down your reasons
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:47 pm
Thanked: 10 times

by Phirozz » Tue Mar 23, 2010 9:50 am
As per question stem, increase in new jobs in county C is startling and the argument which support this conclusion is county C created and filled more manufacturing jobs last year than it had done in previous years.

So making comparison of workforce and unemplyment with that of other counties is irrelevant to our conclusion because we dont know how those counties have performed last year. And we cannot just say increase in new jobs in County C is startling because its workforce is the smallest. Other counties workforce might be larger but their increase in new jobs might be more in %age termsthan that of county C.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1