BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Country X

Expert replies
by rajatvmittal » Sat Jun 15, 2013 9:37 am
From 1945 to 1990, Country X consistently spent 25 percent more on foreign aid than Country Y did. In 1994, for the first time, Country Y spent more on foreign aid than Country X did. Country Y's leaders argue that these figures demonstrate that their nation's commitment to helping other countries has grown.

Which of the following, if true, would help refute the argument of Country Y's leaders?

Of the total amount that Country Y spent on foreign aid in 1994, three-quarters of it consisted of military aid to three nations.
In 1994, Country X spent more on foreign aid to Country Y than Country Y spent on foreign aid to Country X.
In 1994, Country X spent 48 percent as much on foreign aid as it spent in 1945.
In 1989, Country X shifted the bulk of its foreign aid spending from military to nonmilitary assistance.
The combined populations of the countries that receive most of Country Y's foreign aid amount to less than five percent of the world's total population.
Answer C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by theunheardmelody » Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:15 am
Im not understanding this. Below is my chain of reasoning

1. Country X spends 20% more than Y . so If Y spend 100 then X spent 125 from 1945 1990 (each year?).

2. 1994 - Y spends more than X so Y should have spent more than 125 ? Which is more than a 25% increase?

Getting stuck here....Help please
Join the discussion

by Raj700 » Tue Jun 18, 2013 12:00 am
Raja and theunheaedmelody,

ConclusIon:

Country Y takes foreign aid seriously since it now spends more than country X.

Well what if country x just isn't sending as much as it used to? Then Ys argument falls apart.

That's what C does. See it?

--Raj
Join the discussion

by Imsukhi » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:14 am
Experts Help in!!
Join the discussion