Here, our perspective bothers on our ability to make credible assumptions in order to arrive at a compromised view about the passage.

OPTION A - INCORRECT
Since Ethanol can be gotten from agricultural evolution sufficiently it leaves one to ask then why it'd be economical for the Authority to embark on Electric power source which would be costlier and time-consuming. Among the alternatives so far presented, Electric power doesn't look superior to the others.

OPTION B - INCORRECT
Option B assumes that because of the growing demand for ethanol as an alternative to oils, natives has taken it upon themselves to start the production of the product which has made it increased in strength of production nationwide. Furthermore, it has been ordered that all automobiles should run on ethanol and gasoline so it's only important that the production rises above that of oil.

OPTION C - INCORRECT
This is true for low-end users in downtown homes for local appliances but then it's not the aim of the authorities solely because they target wider audience market in order to give it a more national outlook. The financial implication of this option is insignificant compared to automobiles. weak point.

OPTION D - CORRECT
It is not increasing significantly because while oil is being produced for export purposes mainly in order to gain more revenues, the production of ethanol is entirely for domestic purposes which would make it on larger scale compared to gasoline (limited uses).

OPTION E - INCORRECT
Yes, it is true but not entirely because there are some appliances ethanol would be less efficient in. In effect, ethanol may not equate with gasoline in terms of efficiency.