BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Countable-uncountable

Expert replies
by magnus opus » Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:16 am
Less- is to be used for unquantifiable quantities.
Fewer- is used for countable entities.
Lower- is also used for countable quantities.

1.When do we use Lower and when do we use Fewer?

2. We say population is unquantifiable like workforce, so it should use less instead of fewer, but don't we say U.S has a population of 500 million.(which is quantifying it? Please explain this paradox.

3. Are numbers not quantifiable? we say 3 is less than 5 ( not fewer) why is this so?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by lunarpower » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:52 am
magnus opus wrote:Less- is to be used for unquantifiable quantities.
Fewer- is used for countable entities.
Lower- is also used for countable quantities.
the last one of these isn't really correct -- "lower" is generally used for numerical abstractions, such as level, quantity, rate, figure, percentage, etc.
... or for things that aren't really numerical but still have higher and lower levels, e.g., significance, importance, etc.
note that all of these quantities are actually UNcountable. for instance, you would say "less significance", not "fewer significance".

i think that's the source of the confusion here. if you say something like a lower number of dogs, that the word "lower" applies to number, not dogs.
1.When do we use Lower and when do we use Fewer?
see above.
2. We say population is unquantifiable like workforce, so it should use less instead of fewer, but don't we say U.S has a population of 500 million.(which is quantifying it? Please explain this paradox.
yeah, but this is the case with ALL numerical quantifiers.
level
quantity
number
figure
rate
percentage
proportion


you wouldn't use "fewer" with any of these. the numerical quantifiers themselves are uncountable, although the things that are being counted are, of course, countable.

e.g.
there are fewer dogs in my house than in your house.
the number of dogs in my house is lower / less than the number of dogs in your house.
3. Are numbers not quantifiable? we say 3 is less than 5 ( not fewer) why is this so?
same deal as above.

note that sentence correction problems are not going to be talking about pure numbers -- a sentence correction problem is clearly not going to have something like "five plus five" -- so this concern is irrelevant, but it still fits the pattern above. (i.e., you are not going to see a sentence correction problem involving numbers, unless they are either (1) numbers OF something or (2) labeled numbers such as percentages.)
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1