BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Could someone help with this CR question? Thanks!

Expert replies
by anncox1289 » Mon Oct 02, 2017 5:15 pm
Why is the answer C?

Art Historian: Recently, computer analysis has revealed that a few of a famous Flemish artist's works are forgeries, and are actually the work of noted forger Elmyr de Hory. While such a development may emit violent reverberations through the art world, even those museums that have a wealth of the Flemish artists in their collections should not be overly concerned. Hundreds of this Flemish artist's works were tested to determine whether they were forgeries, yet only a slim few turned out to be actual forgeries. Thus, the master's reputation as one of the greatest artists humanity has ever produced will surely remain undiminished.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the art historian's conclusion?

A. The computer analysis involved is more likely to mistake an actual work as a forgery than to mistake a forgery as an actual work.
B. Many of the Flemish artist's well-known portraits are in the collection of private owners and were therefore not subjected to computer analysis.
C. Some of the works upon which the Flemish artist's standing rests were identified by the computer analysis to be the work of de Hory.
D. Some museums, worrying that their most prized painting from the Flemish artist would be deemed forgeries, and thus lose value, only offered up the artist's lesser known works for computer analysis.
E. Though few in the art world dispute the outcome of the computer analysis of the Flemish artist's work, many contend that the identified forgeries are not the work of Elmyr de Hory but some other highly skilled forger.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Vincen » Sun Oct 08, 2017 10:48 am
I can see why D and E are not correct. But, what is wrong with A and B?
Join the discussion

by ErikaPrepScholar » Thu Oct 12, 2017 9:21 am
Hey anncox1289 and Vincen,

The historian's argument is that only a few of the artist's paintings were determined to be forgeries. Thus, because so many of the artist's paintings were actually his/hers, the artist's reputation is still intact. We need to weaken this argument.

A. If computer analysis is more likely to accidentally determine a real work is a forgery than that a forgery is a real work, this means that if any mistakes were made, it's most likely that some of the few "forgeries" were actually real works! This means that more of the artist's paintings were actually his/hers. This strengthens the argument. Eliminate.
B. If many of the artist's well-known paintings were not tested, we can infer that they may be forgeries. But we don't *know* that they are forgeries - we just know they weren't tested. If the paintings were tested and turned out to be forgeries, this would weaken the argument, but right now, it doesn't do much. Eliminate.
C. If some of the works that make this artist "a master" are actually not his/hers, this means that our artist isn't actually that great. Sure, only a few of the paintings are forgeries, but they're the best ones! It doesn't really matter if the not-so-great paintings belong to the artist if the really-great ones don't. This definitely weakens the argument. Correct.
D. Like B, this just tells us that some of the well-known paintings weren't tested and might be forgeries, not that they ARE. This isn't as strong as C. Eliminate.
E. If the forgeries identified were actually some other forger ... they're still forgeries, and there are still only a few of them. Eliminate.
Image

Erika John - Content Manager/Lead Instructor
https://gmat.prepscholar.com/gmat/s/

Get tutoring from me or another PrepScholar GMAT expert: https://gmat.prepscholar.com/gmat/s/tutoring/

Learn about our exclusive savings for BTG members (up to 25% off) and our 5 day free trial

Check out our PrepScholar GMAT YouTube channel, and read our expert guides on the PrepScholar GMAT blog
Join the discussion