BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Cost

Expert replies
by heshamelaziry » Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:09 am
In a certain country, the retail price include a value added tax of 12 1/2 percent of the sum of the whole cost and the mark up of an item. If the value added tax on a certain jacket is 6 shillings, what is the wholesale cost of the tax in shillings ?

A) The mark-up represents 50 percent of the wholesale cost.

B) The mark-up of the jacket is 16 shillings.


D
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by xcusemeplz2009 » Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:35 am
vat=121/2%(w+m)
oe v=25/200(w+m)
v=vat=6
w=whole sale
m=mark up

s1)
m=1/2 w
so
6=(w+1/2w)*25/200
solv we can get w suff

S2)
m=16
so 6=1/8*(w+16)

solving we can get w suff

hence D
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:57 am
?! any easier or better laid down solution ? thanks
Join the discussion

Re: Cost

by Testluv » Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:13 pm
Hi Hesham,

Here is the most powerful strategy in data sufficiency: If you have to solve for any of "n" unknowns, you require "n" number of linear distinct equations.

So, if a word problem gave you three unknowns, you would need three linear distinct equations. Let's say the unknowns are x, y, and z. And then, say, I told you x=5. This is an equation (because it has an equal sign). But is it sufficient to solve for y or z? Nope.

Now, let's say I told you z = 10. So, now we know that x = 5 and z = 10. Clearly, we know what x and z are. But can we solve for y with these two equations? Of course not: y is still unknown!

Because there are three unknowns, we would need three equations to solve for the value of any of the unknowns.

If you know this, then it can really decrease the difficulty of a lot of DS questions. In fact, you can use this strategy even if you don't know what an equation is; all you need to know is that there is an equation, and the number of unknowns.

Let's apply the strategy to this problem:

In a certain country, the retail price include a value added tax of 12 1/2 percent of the sum of the whole cost and the mark up of an item. If the value added tax on a certain jacket is 6 shillings, what is the wholesale cost of the tax in shillings ?

A) The mark-up represents 50 percent of the wholesale cost.

B) The mark-up of the jacket is 16 shillings.
Let's translate the English sentence into an algebraic sentence. When translating, know the important terms, go slow, and chunk it up.

We learn that retail price INCLUDES a tax. Includes is not the same as EQUAL. "Retail price" is a red herring here.

The rest of the first sentence gives us English for the tax equation. The tax (let's call tax T) is equal to: 12 1/2 percent of the sum of the whole cost and the mark up of an item.

We don't know the whole cost (so, let's call it WC) or the mark-up (so, let's call it MU). These are 2 unknowns.

The question is asking for WC (but it wouldn't have made a difference had the question been asking for MU).

The tax is 12.5 percent of the sum of those two unknowns.

So, what is their sum? WC + MU

We have to take 12.5 percent of this.

"of" usually means multiply in word problems:

Tax = 12.5%*(WC + MU)

We are told the tax was 6 shillings:

6 = 12.5% (WC + MU)

How many equal signs there?..1
And, how many unknowns (ie, letters) there?...2

We have one equation and two unknowns.

We will have sufficiency if we get an equation relating either WC or MU to a quantity (so long as there isn't a brand new unknown!)

We will have sufficiency if a statement gives us a value for WC or MU.

We will also have sufficiency if we get a special equation relating WC and MU.

ONLY now, after this analysis, are we ready to go to the statements.

Statement 1:

The mark-up represents 50 percent of the wholesale cost.

MU = 0.5*WC

So, in the original equation, we can replace "MU" with "0.5WC" and we would have sufficiency.

Of course, because it is data sufficiency we don't actually do that; we just know that we COULD do that.

Statement 1 is sufficient.

Statement 2 provides us with a value for one of our unknowns. Sufficient.

Choose D

Now, because it is data sufficiency, we didn't even have to write the original equation. We could just have noted that we had an equation relating tax to two unknowns, and said to ourselves: "I am in a one-equation and two-unkowns problem."
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by xcusemeplz2009 » Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:27 am
heshamelaziry wrote:?! any easier or better laid down solution ? thanks
in word problem type DS its enough to frame the eqn and then just check u r given suff informn to solve no need to solve...

with the q stem if the eqn is framed then we just need to know what informn is reqd to solve it...
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion