BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Corporation profits

Expert replies
by Sprite_TM » Wed Apr 01, 2009 6:19 pm
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for our chemical division, which has traditionally contributed about 60 percent of the corporation’s profits. It is therefore encouraging that there is the following evidence that the pharmaceutical division is growing stronger: it contributed 45 percent of the corporation’s profits, up from 20 percent the previous year.

On the basis of the facts stated, which of the following is the best critique of the evidence presented above?

(A) The increase in the pharmaceutical division’s contribution to corporation profits could have resulted largely from the introduction of single, important new product.
(B) In multidivisional corporations that have pharmaceutical divisions, over half of the corporation’s profits usually come from the pharmaceuticals.
(C) The percentage of the corporation’s profits attributable to the pharmaceutical division could have increased even if that division’s performance had not improved.
(D) The information cited does not make it possible to determine whether the 20 percent share of profits cited was itself an improvement over the year before.
(E) The information cited does not make it possible to compare the performance of the chemical and pharmaceutical divisions in of the percent of total profits attributable to each.

OA C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by scoobydooby » Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:07 pm
we need to find out the flaw in the reasoning

the evidence: PD's share of profit grew from 25% to 45% so the PD grew stronger.
what if the PD's actual and the company's overall profit fell?

if say overall profit:100, PD's profit: 25
following year overall profit fell to 50, PD's profit: 22.5
=> PD's profit actually fell, so based on the % contribution only we cant conclude that the division grew.
hence C

(in questions with % an increasing % may not always mean increasing numbers and vice-versa)
Join the discussion

by thought » Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:45 pm
Here's another way to look at this.

My paraphrase of the argument:

Because, the PD's contribution to profits is up to 45% from 20%, we should be encouraged.

IMO, the best critique is one that says we should not be encouraged about this increase.


(A) I didn't find this to be relevant to the paraphrased argument
(B) I didn't find this to be relevant to the paraphrased argument
(C) Bingo! If the percentage of the corporation’s profits attributable to the pharmaceutical division could have increased even if that division’s performance had not improved then the conclusion does not follow. (We should NOT be encouraged because there is no real improvement.)
(D) I didn't find this to be relevant to my paraphrased argument
(E) Maybe. I could see this being argued as a fair critique but it doesn't directly critique the premise or the conclusion of the paraphrased argument.
Join the discussion

by Brad.C » Sun May 15, 2016 6:42 am
I would go with option C
Join the discussion

by graem83d » Sun May 15, 2016 7:12 am
My intuition whispers that it is C
Join the discussion