BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

corporate executives

Expert replies
by gmatnmein2010 » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:25 am
A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to have "take charge" personalities, with the predominant traits of assertiveness, decisiveness, and self-confidence. The researcher concluded that people who are more "take charge" than the average person are more likely to become corporate executives.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher's conclusion?


1)Holding the job of a corporate executive causes people to develop "take charge" personality traits.


2)When working on charitable or community projects, corporate executives often use their ability to make decisions and lead people to make those projects successful.


3)Some people who are not executives have stronger "take charge" personalities than some people who currently serve as corporate executives.


4)Many people who aspire to become executives exhibit different management styles in their current jobs.


5)The executives that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful when they tried to manage their family activities as they do their business activities.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by fibbonnaci » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:33 am
research study: corporate executives have 'take charge' personalities.
Conclusion: people who have take charge personalities -> likely to become corporate executive.

Now this is similiar to cause -> effect reasoning. what if effect-> cause? This is a definite weakener.

1)Holding the job of a corporate executive causes people to develop “take charge� personality traits. [addresses E -> C. Correct.]


2)When working on charitable or community projects, corporate executives often use their ability to make decisions and lead people to make those projects successful. [this no ways addresses the stimulus. Eliminated]


3)Some people who are not executives have stronger “take charge� personalities than some people who currently serve as corporate executives. [let them have stronger take charge personalities. acc to the passage they are more likely to become corp executives. this does not weaken the conclusion. Eliminated!]


4)Many people who aspire to become executives exhibit different management styles in their current jobs. [we are not talking about people who aspire. we talking about traits and people. Eliminated!]


5)The executives that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful when they tried to manage their family activities as they do their business activities.[ when did family activities fall into corporate executive management skills. no research is needed to conclude this. LOL!! but seriously family activity has nothing to do with corporate life. Eliminated!]

Hope this helps!
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:17 am
gmatnmein2010 wrote:A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to have "take charge" personalities, with the predominant traits of assertiveness, decisiveness, and self-confidence. The researcher concluded that people who are more "take charge" than the average person are more likely to become corporate executives.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher's conclusion?


1)Holding the job of a corporate executive causes people to develop "take charge" personality traits.


2)When working on charitable or community projects, corporate executives often use their ability to make decisions and lead people to make those projects successful.


3)Some people who are not executives have stronger "take charge" personalities than some people who currently serve as corporate executives.


4)Many people who aspire to become executives exhibit different management styles in their current jobs.


5)The executives that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful when they tried to manage their family activities as they do their business activities.
IMO A
If a "take charge" personality is observed in people who are corporate executives because the job itself causes those traits to emerge, then the researcher's conclusion that the personality traits lead to the job would be weakened.
Join the discussion

by komal » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:10 am
gmatnmein2010 wrote:A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to have "take charge" personalities, with the predominant traits of assertiveness, decisiveness, and self-confidence. The researcher concluded that people who are more "take charge" than the average person are more likely to become corporate executives.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher's conclusion?

Cause : take charge personalities
effect : become corporate executives


1)Holding the job of a corporate executive causes people to develop "take charge" personality traits.
Correct : This weakens the conclusion by reversing roles of causal relationship. (Cause : job of corporate executive Effect: develop 'take charge' personalities)

2)When working on charitable or community projects, corporate executives often use their ability to make decisions and lead people to make those projects successful.
Incorrect : 'Charitable or community projects of corporate executives does nothing do undermine the conclusion.

3)Some people who are not executives have stronger "take charge" personalities than some people who currently serve as corporate executives.
Incorrect : Comparison between corporate executives and ppl who are not executives is irrelevant here.

4)Many people who aspire to become executives exhibit different management styles in their current jobs.
Incorrect : Management styles of ppl who 'aspire' to become executives does nothing to weaken the conclusion.

5)The executives that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful when they tried to manage their family activities as they do their business activities.
Incorrect : Family activities blah blah blahhhh IRRELEVANT here.
Join the discussion

by finas83 » Fri Aug 14, 2015 3:19 am
Dear All,
need great help. Appreciate your comments.
I got confused between A and C.

Conclusion: people who are more "take charge" than the average person are more likely to become corporate executives.

Possible weaken: 1. not all people with more take charge will become corporate executive
2. Executive jobs requires that

I got confused between A and C and ended up with C.
how to avoid this confusion.
Hope to hear from you. Many thanks
Many thanks.
Join the discussion