BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Corn harvest during a drought

Expert replies
by pareekbharat86 » Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:57 pm
The drought in the central part of the country is estimated to reduce this year's national corn harvest by more than one-third from its normal levels. Such a shortfall would subsequently increase meat and other food prices by about 17% in one year and 20% in two years. So, either we spend a small amount now to irrigate the largest affected corn fields and avert severe inflation later, or else fail to irrigate now and ensure inflation later.

The argument is valid only if

a. other American agricultural areas are also not expected to meet their anticipated corn yields this year
b. irrigation is the only way that the national corn yield can be significantly increased
c. the heat wave and drought will persist through the next two years
d. irrigation will ensure that corn harvests reach normal levels
e. it is politically feasible for government authorities to spend money irrigating fields at the present time

OA is B. Why not D
Thanks,
Bharat.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Abhishek009 » Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:07 pm
pareekbharat86 wrote:The drought in the central part of the country is estimated to reduce this year's national corn harvest by more than one-third from its normal levels. Such a shortfall would subsequently increase meat and other food prices by about 17% in one year and 20% in two years. So, either we spend a small amount now to irrigate the largest affected corn fields and avert severe inflation later, or else fail to irrigate now and ensure inflation later.

Corn harvest is estimated to be reduced by 33% due to drought.

Subsequent rise in Food Prices by 17% during the first Year and 20% during the second year.



Inflation can be prevented if investments are made to irrigate the largest affected corn fields.


The argument is valid only if -

a. other American agricultural areas are also not expected to meet their anticipated corn yields this year

The passage talks about - " The drought in the central part of the country ...."

b. irrigation is the only way that the national corn yield can be significantly increased

True , the passage tells us - " So, either we spend a small amount now to irrigate the largest affected corn fields ...."

c. the heat wave and drought will persist through the next two years

The passage doesn't mention the same

" Such a shortfall would subsequently increase meat and other food prices....by about 17% in one year and 20% in two years."

The passage mentions that drought will ultimately lead to inflation in the economy which will increase year after year.

d. irrigation will ensure that corn harvests reach normal levels

The passage mentions irrigation to avert the situation but " Normal Levels " is not talked about the the situation calls for averting the issue at hand.

" So, either we spend a small amount now to irrigate the largest affected corn fields and avert severe inflation later...."

It can be such that after irrigation investments , production was 95% of the Normal Levels and Consumers are willing to Purchase it at 5% inflated Price , this averting the high Inflation condition...

e. it is politically feasible for government authorities to spend money irrigating fields at the present time

Out of scope , the author mentions the same assuming that the Government can spend some money ...
Abhishek
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:08 am
Hi Bharat,

This CR has 2 answers that appear similar, but you can find the correct answer if you pay attention to the details (especially what you KNOW vs. what you DON'T KNOW).

The facts:
-The drought is estimated to reduce the corn harvest by more than 1/3 from its NORMAL LEVELS. What is a "normal level" though? Does that mean "enough corn"?
-The corn shortfall will cause meat and other food prices to go up.

The conclusion:
-We need to spend an amount now to irrigate the largest corn fields and avert later inflation.

The Logic:
There's CLEARLY not going to be enough corn, but was there going to be enough corn BEFORE the drought (when levels were normal)? We don't know. We just know that we need more corn to avert the inflation. Whether levels return to "normal" or "above normal" is not a factor in the logic. Answer B fits.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion