BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Copeland cigarette tax

Expert replies
by LulaBrazilia » Tue Jan 28, 2014 7:12 pm
Sonya: The government of Copeland is raising the cigarette tax. Copeland's cigarette prices will still be reasonably low, so cigarette consumption will probably not be affected much. Consequently, government revenue from the tax will increase.

Raoul: True, smoking is unlikely to decrease, because Copeland's cigarette prices will still not be high. They will, however, no longer be the lowest in the region, so we might begin to see substantial illegal sales of smuggled cigarettes in Copeland.

Raoul responds to Sonya's argument by doing which of the following?

(A) Questioning the support for Sonya's conclusion by distinguishing carefully between no change and no decrease

(B) Calling Sonya's conclusion into question by pointing to a possible effect of a certain change

(C) Arguing that Sonya's conclusion would be better supported if Sonya could cite a precedent for what she predicts will happen

(D) Showing that a cause that Sonya claims will be producing a certain effect is not the only cause that could produce that effect

(E) Pointing out that a certain initiative is not bold enough to have the effect that Sonya predicts it will have
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Patrick_GMATFix » Tue Jan 28, 2014 7:46 pm
Raoul does not dispute Sonya's premise (prices will still be low, and consumption will not be affected), but he challenges her conclusion (that govt revenue from the tax will increase) by introducing a new premise (new prices will be higher than others in the region) and suggesting an alternate conclusion (ppl will buy cigarettes illegally and avoid paying the tax). The full solution below is taken from the GMATFix App.

Image

-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Tue Jan 28, 2014 7:55 pm
Hi LulaBrazilia,

This CR question is an example of a "conversation" prompt. In these situations, it's important to be clear on what the two people agree on and disagree on.

Sonya's logic:
-The government of Copeland is raising the tax on cigarettes
-Even with the tax, the price of cigarettes will still be reasonably low, so consumption probably won't change much
-The government will see INCREASED REVENUE from the tax.

Raoul's logic:
-Cigratte prices will still not be high, so smoking is unlikely to decrease.
-Cigarette prices will NOT be the lowest in the region.
-There might be substantial ILLEGAL SALES of smuggled cigarettes in Copeland.

Agree:
-Tax isn't enough to affect consumption
-Cigarette price will still be relatively low

Disagree:
-Government will see revenue increase from tax.
-Illegal sales of cigarettes could be substantial.

Sonya's entire argument works IF cigarettes are purchased LEGALLY (then they'll be taxed and the government will have revenue). Raoul points out that her argument won't necessarily work because raising the tax could lead to an increase in illegal/smuggled cigarettes that WON'T BE TAXED (so the government WON'T have that revenue). We need an answer that matches this logic.

Final Answer: B

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion