Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Coordinate Geometry

Expert replies
by kuiper » Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:06 pm
https://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=PqPnlgJ

Question on this image along with answer choices. I actually answered [spoiler]C - 10sqrt(2)[/spoiler]


I am using the approach - Area of Triangle - 1/2 * b * h

The base of the triangle can be figured out as 5sqrt(2) given the two coordinates of the base and using the distance formula.

The height of the triangle is - 4? (Drawn from point R to x-axis)

And therefore - [spoiler]10sqrt(2) [/spoiler]- which is incorrect

Seems like I might be miscalculating the height but I am not sure why that is incorrect?

I appreciate any help.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Night reader » Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:45 pm
kuiper wrote:https://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=PqPnlgJ

Question on this image along with answer choices. I actually answered [spoiler]C - 10sqrt(2)[/spoiler]


I am using the approach - Area of Triangle - 1/2 * b * h

The base of the triangle can be figured out as 5sqrt(2) given the two coordinates of the base and using the distance formula.

The height of the triangle is - 4? (Drawn from point R to x-axis)

And therefore - [spoiler]10sqrt(2) [/spoiler]- which is incorrect

Seems like I might be miscalculating the height but I am not sure why that is incorrect?

I appreciate any help.
Unfortunately your answer is not correct; even if the figures are not drawn to the scale, the answer is not correct.

Look you don't need tedious calculations here besides finding the area of three triangles and one quadrilateral.

Area triangle EFB = (4*3)/2 = 6
Area triangle DFC = (3*4)/2 = 6
Area triangle ADE = (7*1)/2 = 3.5

Area qdrl. ABCD = 7*4 = 28

Area of triangle PQR = Area ABCD - Areas (EFB, DFC, ADE) or 28-6-6-3.5 = 12.5

Answer A.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Night reader on Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by kuiper » Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:53 pm
No, you are absolutely correct. The answer in the sample image was not correct either.

All I am wondering is - why is the height of the triangle in the image not 4? - (per my post above)
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:56 pm
kuiper wrote:No, you are absolutely correct. The answer in the sample image was not correct either.

All I am wondering is - why is the height of the triangle in the image not 4? - (per my post above)
Why you are supplying us with the incorrect answer selected on the GMAT Prep then?!

you mentioned different answer of yours...

please quit your question, for you were demonstrated the easiest way how to solve this problem
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:04 pm
kuiper wrote:https://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=PqPnlgJ

Question on this image along with answer choices. I actually answered [spoiler]C - 10sqrt(2)[/spoiler]


I am using the approach - Area of Triangle - 1/2 * b * h

The base of the triangle can be figured out as 5sqrt(2) given the two coordinates of the base and using the distance formula.

The height of the triangle is - 4? (Drawn from point R to x-axis)

And therefore - [spoiler]10sqrt(2) [/spoiler]- which is incorrect

Seems like I might be miscalculating the height but I am not sure why that is incorrect?

I appreciate any help.
I Don't understand 5sqrt(2) ?

we may not assume the PQR is a right triangle, also we are not given any angle at the base (but we can calculate these).

sqrt(2) coefficient is usual per the right triangles of which the non-hypotenuse sides are equal; this speeds up calculations.
Join the discussion

by beat_gmat_09 » Fri Dec 03, 2010 7:44 pm
OPQ is right angled at origin with sides 3,4 hypotenuse PQ=5 from pythagorean triplets.
PR is a hypotenuse formed if you drop a perpendicular from R to x-axis
This forms another pythagorean triplet, with PR=5
Similarly RQ is one side of triangle formed when perpendicular from R is dropped on Q (y-axis)
RQ=7 and in this triangle another length is 1
Hypotenuse RQ^2 = 7^2 + 1^2 = 50
RQ = Sqrt(50)
PQ= 5, RP=5 from RQ it can be found out that RPQ is right angled at P.
Area of PQR = 1/2(5)(5) = 12.5
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Fri Dec 03, 2010 7:58 pm
beat_gmat_09 wrote: RQ = Sqrt(50)
PQ= 5, RP=5 from RQ it can be found out that RPQ is right angled at P.
the coordinates of the point R could be skewed to new coordinates (4<x<7; 0<y<4) this will invalidate your solution;
that 5^2 and 5^2 should make Sqrt(50) coincidence as long as your assumption of a right triangle - the values could not make up hypotenuse...
Join the discussion

by beat_gmat_09 » Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:10 pm
Image

x+y=90 in triangle OPE 3-4-5 triplet
x+y=90 in triangle PCR 3-4-5 triplet
Angle F = 180 - (x+y) = 180 - 90 = 90
Triangle PQR is right angled at P.
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:25 pm
You may have skewed R, different sides (not 3 and 4) x and x are not equal, y and y are not equal, in your example what makes them relative is 3 and 4 in two triangles {3;4}, {4;3}

this solution is unique and works only for this problem...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion

by beat_gmat_09 » Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:32 pm
If you cut triangle RPC rotate it 90 degrees clockwise and place it on triangle POQ you'll
see the triangles are exactly same, their sides and their angles (common angle 90 degree and angles x and y).
Do you still disagree ?
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:36 pm
beat_gmat_09 wrote:If you cut triangle RPC rotate it 90 degrees clockwise and place it on triangle POQ you'll
see the triangles are exactly same, their sides and their angles (common angle 90 degree and angles x and y).
Do you still disagree ?
I don't disagree, your solution is unique to this problem with the given set of conditions. If an aim is to solve the problem - you nailed it; while this solution would not be useful if R is skewed.

By principle, the first solution is more handy; not because it's mine - but for its universality
Join the discussion

by beat_gmat_09 » Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:41 pm
Either way.
Whichever works in 2 minutes ;)
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion