BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Coordinate Geometry Problem

Expert replies
by Cedagmat » Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:05 pm
179. If line l passes through point (m,- n), is the slope of the line negative?
(1) The line passes through point (-m, n).
(2) m^n is negative.

Answer: E

S1: If we solve for the slope which is rise/run--> slope = (-n-n)/(m- -m)= -(n/m) which is by definition a negative slope. Sufficient.
S2: This means that m is negative and that n is odd. Insufficient.

Can anyone tell me why S1 is insufficient?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Ian Stewart » Sat Nov 13, 2010 7:02 pm
Cedagmat wrote:179. If line l passes through point (m,- n), is the slope of the line negative?
(1) The line passes through point (-m, n).
(2) m^n is negative.

Answer: E

S1: If we solve for the slope which is rise/run--> slope = (-n-n)/(m- -m)= -(n/m) which is by definition a negative slope. Sufficient.
-(n/m) is not necessarily a negative number -- it will be if n and m are both positive, but we're not told that here. If, say, n = -1 and m = 1, then -(n/m) = -(-1/1) = 1.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by Cedagmat » Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:26 am
So in this case, it does not matter that that problem has stated that the signs associated with m and n?
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:12 pm
Cedagmat wrote:So in this case, it does not matter that that problem has stated that the signs associated with m and n?
I'm afraid I don't understand the question; the problem doesn't tell you anything about the signs of m or n.

I think you might be assuming that -m is a negative number here. That's not necessarily true. The expression -m is negative if m is positive, but it's positive when m is negative.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by Cedagmat » Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:48 am
That answered my question. I though that -m meant that m was a negative number, but I see your point about it being an expression. That definitely explains my error.
Join the discussion