BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Coordinate Geometry Problem

Expert replies
by Cedagmat » Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:05 pm
179. If line l passes through point (m,- n), is the slope of the line negative?
(1) The line passes through point (-m, n).
(2) m^n is negative.

Answer: E

S1: If we solve for the slope which is rise/run--> slope = (-n-n)/(m- -m)= -(n/m) which is by definition a negative slope. Sufficient.
S2: This means that m is negative and that n is odd. Insufficient.

Can anyone tell me why S1 is insufficient?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Ian Stewart » Sat Nov 13, 2010 7:02 pm
Cedagmat wrote:179. If line l passes through point (m,- n), is the slope of the line negative?
(1) The line passes through point (-m, n).
(2) m^n is negative.

Answer: E

S1: If we solve for the slope which is rise/run--> slope = (-n-n)/(m- -m)= -(n/m) which is by definition a negative slope. Sufficient.
-(n/m) is not necessarily a negative number -- it will be if n and m are both positive, but we're not told that here. If, say, n = -1 and m = 1, then -(n/m) = -(-1/1) = 1.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by Cedagmat » Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:26 am
So in this case, it does not matter that that problem has stated that the signs associated with m and n?
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:12 pm
Cedagmat wrote:So in this case, it does not matter that that problem has stated that the signs associated with m and n?
I'm afraid I don't understand the question; the problem doesn't tell you anything about the signs of m or n.

I think you might be assuming that -m is a negative number here. That's not necessarily true. The expression -m is negative if m is positive, but it's positive when m is negative.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by Cedagmat » Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:48 am
That answered my question. I though that -m meant that m was a negative number, but I see your point about it being an expression. That definitely explains my error.
Join the discussion