BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Continents to split apart

Expert replies
by gmatrant » Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:11 pm
New theories propose that catastrophic impacts of asteroids and comets may have caused reversals in the Earth's magnetic field, the onset of ice ages, splitting apart continents 80 million years ago, and great volcanic eruptions.
(A) splitting apart continents
(B) the splitting apart of continents
(C) split apart continents
(D) continents split apart
(E) continents that were split apart

The answer is A. I agree. I just wanted to confirm the below.
If D read "continents to split apart", is this right grammatically?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:16 pm
option d says continents split apart which is correct but as u say continents to split apart is not there in the options
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:35 pm
What is wrong with option B here? It looks parallel to me..

New theories propose that catastrophic impacts of asteroids and comets may have caused reversals in the Earth's magnetic field, the onset of ice ages, the splitting apart of continents 80 million years ago, and great volcanic eruptions.
Join the discussion

by gmatrant » Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:39 pm
Apologies OA is B not A. (that was a typo).

Please answer my question. I agree with the OA, but want to clarify a concept.
Join the discussion

by 786 » Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:07 am
How do you choose between A and B ?

the sentence does say the onset ...... but it doesnt say the reversals or the great volcanic eruptions .
Join the discussion

by loveusonu » Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:27 am
786 wrote:How do you choose between A and B ?

the sentence does say the onset ...... but it doesnt say the reversals or the great volcanic eruptions .
Its a parallelism in Noun form.

Splitting is a verb but according to grammer rules, adding THE to the progressive verb makes it noun or gerund to be precise.

The onset, reversal, eruptions and the splitting all are noun.

hope that helps!
Sonu
--------
When you want something desperately, the whole Universe conspires in helping to give it to you - The Alchemist
Join the discussion

by 786 » Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:49 am
yup :)
Join the discussion

by clawhammer » Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:38 am
Can anyone tell me why C isn't correct?
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:51 am
"split apart continent" is definitely a verb here, not the gerund/noun that is required to maintain parallelism.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by clawhammer » Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:08 am
uwhusky wrote:"split apart continent" is definitely a verb here, not the gerund/noun that is required to maintain parallelism.
Isn't this correct:

New theories propose that catastrophic impacts of asteroids and comets may have caused split apart continents.

?

- He could see the split apart continents from the outer-space.
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:13 am
uwhusky wrote:"split apart continent" is definitely a verb here, not the gerund/noun that is required to maintain parallelism.
@uwhusky
C - I do not think that split apart in split apart continents is a verb.
This is because then, the sentence would completely break down. Notice the non underlined parts -
- caused reversals in the Earth's magnetic field, the onset of ice ages..., and great volcanic eruptions

The parallel parts here are -
Catastrophic impacts of asteroids and comets may have caused
1. reversals in the Earth's magnetic field (noun phrase)
2. the onset of ice ages (noun phrase)
3. great volcanic eruptions (noun phrase)

Now notice the underlined part in C-
split apart continents - if split is a verb, then we are introducing a verb and an object in between three parallel noun phrases. This cannot be correct.

Actually in option C, split apart is an adjective modifying continents. So split apart continents is a noun phrase.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:16 am
clawhammer wrote:Can anyone tell me why C isn't correct?
@clawhammer -
As written above, in option C,
split apart continents is a noun phrase with split apart modifying continents. Hence, this is parallel with the other noun phrases. However, the meaning is distorted.

Notice the parallel structure -
Catastrophic impacts of asteroids and comets may have caused -
1) reversals in the Earth's magnetic field
2) the onset of ice ages
3) split apart continents
4) great volcanic eruptions

This would mean that asteroid impacts have caused split apart continents (adjective-noun). Now, clearly, impacts did not cause continents, rather impacts caused the splitting apart of continents.

That is why option C is wrong and B is right.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:30 am
@niksworth

I guess we can agree that C is incorrect for different reasons. IMO, "split apart" to me is an incorrect usage of verb, thus C is wrong.

Edit: I just verified that this is indeed an OG question, which is question #119 (12th edition).

The explanation in the back of the book is also calling C an incorrect usage of verb.

I think if it is used as an adjective, it should be in participle like most verbs that are used as adjectives. Furthermore, GMAT makes it easier by using articles in front of the gerunds to signal that it is a gerund as oppose to a verb or verbal.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:44 am
@uwhusky

Agreed. Since C is incorrect, the same phrase cannot be correct for one reason while incorrect for the other. It must be incorrect for both. Silly me :)
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:49 am
Nothing silly, good discussions!
Yep.
Join the discussion