BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Considering the current economy, the introduction of new

Expert replies
by airan » Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:38 am
Considering the current economy, the introduction of new brand of cereal is unlikely to expand total sales of cereal, but rather will just cause some existing buyers of cereal to switch brands. So it makes no sense for Coolidge corporation to introduce another brand of cereal. since they will only hurt sales of the brands of cereal they already produce.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above ?

1. Total sales of cereal will increase as the total population increases.

2. Many new brands of cereal sell extremely well for the first year of their existence.

3.Coolidge corporation currently produces fewer brands of cereal than do its competitors.

4. Some cereal buyers regularly switch from brand to brand, even when no new brands have been introduced.

5. Research indicates that the new brand will attract more buyers of competitor's cereal than buyers of Coolidge brands.

OA is 5
Last edited by airan on Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Thanks
Airan
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Anon » Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:13 am
Research indicates that the new brand will attract more buyers of competitor's cereal than buyers of Coolidge brands.
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:28 pm
IMO:E

Here it is assumed that the introduction of new brand will attract the customers of the Coolidge corporation's brand that is already in the market and thus its sales will go down.

E weakens this by stating that the new brand will attract the competitor's customers more than the customers of Coolidge corporation's brand already in the market and thus sales will not go down.

i hope this helps..

i am feelin sleepy :wink:

thx
Join the discussion

by lvincy » Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:30 pm
IMO - D
The argument is does it make sense to introduce new brand or not.
And
As per D it makes sense to introduce the brand because if they don't introduce then also people will switch and which will hurt other brands.


lvincy
Join the discussion

by svaradhan » Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:46 pm
IMO - D
The argument is does it make sense to introduce new brand or not.
And
As per D it makes sense to introduce the brand because if they don't introduce then also people will switch and which will hurt other brands.


lvincy

Hi lvincy,

It cannot be D - because if D is true, it is all the more a reason for the company to release the new brand. Anyway, people will change brand and hence, the introduction of new brand may help the boost up the sales.
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 1:02 am
I would go with option D as the correct option
Join the discussion