BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Consider this while posting a new question

Expert replies
by niksworth » Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:45 am
This is addressed to all users of BTG.

In order to make the discussions in this community richer, consider the following whenever you are posting a new question -

1. Please underline the part of the sentence in question in SC -
I have observed that quite often posters do not underline the required part. This requires an additional effort on the part of other members to figure out the incorrect part of the sentence from the answer choices and creates unnecessary confusion.

2. Please provide the OA -
Either you can provide OA in the original post itself or after some discussion. However, I have often seen that original posters completely forget about providing the OA even after an appreciable discussion has taken place. The same phenomenon is rampant in RC section as well. This totally defeats the purpose. Fellow members take pains to point out the different flaws in the sentence. It is imperative that such discussions see a logical conclusion which is impossible without the actual OA.

3. Please provide the source of the question -
Mentioning the source is critically important to ensure that members do not waste their precious time on questions which have suspect / non standard origins.

4. Please post your doubts in the original post -
If you have a specific doubt in a question, then please explicitly mention that doubt so that fellow members can focus on it.
This is already being followed by few members. I have seen that this approach provides a much better discussion and has more takeaways. If, on the other hand, you want to just share a good question with the community, then posting the question only is quite okay.

Other suggestions are welcome.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by uwhusky » Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:55 am
Please cite your reference used in explanations. I think it is important to give credit to those that have provided great explanations, and also the same reason #3 is suggested above would be true for citing reference in explanations.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Tue May 10, 2011 11:35 am
excellent and welcome back niksworth!

You can as well ask people just not to write IMO answer choice or +1 vote for Answer choice. I have love for democracy but it won't help to improve GMAT score :).

Whoever does answers this way , wastes one's time.
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Tue May 10, 2011 6:10 pm
Except for point 2 I agree for the rest. Please version out your draft rule with a new release having no point 2.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by sandy217 » Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:08 am
HSPA wrote:Except for point 2 I agree for the rest. Please version out your draft rule with a new release having no point 2.
Whats wrong with point 2? it is very much required.They are many abandoned threads lying in SC/CR.After so much effort we dont get the OA, the whole purpose is defeated.

Kudos for the rules.Hope everyone adheres to those.
Join the discussion

by tuanquang269 » Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:38 am
You can as well ask people just not to write IMO answer choice or +1 vote for Answer choice. I have love for democracy but it won't help to improve GMAT score .
No, I still advocate the one who just write IMO answer choice or +1 vote for answer choice because sometimes I can refer to them like the vote for the correct choice in debatable question until the OA appear.
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:32 pm
When I come here to help people, I am definitely more attracted to posts with #4. I like answering specific questions!
Join the discussion

by ariz » Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:28 pm
Great tips! I wish more people would consider these when posting their questions here :)

Instead of browsing the forum, I opt to follow the experts since I'll be certain to receive an answer and detail explanation by the end when I am done with the question
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:30 am
OA is always marked with SPOILER .. I guess it spoils the play... this the premise I offer for my conclusion.
sandy217 wrote:
HSPA wrote:Except for point 2 I agree for the rest. Please version out your draft rule with a new release having no point 2.
Whats wrong with point 2? it is very much required.They are many abandoned threads lying in SC/CR.After so much effort we dont get the OA, the whole purpose is defeated.

Kudos for the rules.Hope everyone adheres to those.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1