BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Consecutive XYZ

Expert replies
by sumanr84 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 8:08 am
If x, y, and z are integers, and x < y < z, is z - y = y - x?

(1) The mean of the set {x, y, z, 4} is greater than the mean of the set {x, y, z}.
(2) The median of the set {x, y, z, 4} is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}.

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
Both statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER one ALONE is sufficient.
EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

MGMAT ( 700-800)
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Fri Feb 12, 2010 8:14 am
If a set of integers are consecutive integers, then the mean and median of the set will be equal.

Statement 1: insufficient, we are only given information about the mean of the set. Fromt his information we can see that 4 is greater than the mean of set (x, y, z). We know this because if a number greater than the mean is inserted into a set the mean will increase.

Statement 2: Insufficient, we are only given information about the median of the set. From this information we can see that 4 is less than the median of the set (x, y, z).

Combining 1 and 2: sufficient: From the two statements we learn that the median and mean are not equal. Therefore the integers are not consecutive. Choose C
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:49 pm
Osirus has done perfectly. Here is how MGMAT soln goes for those who want detailed expln,

If z - y = y - x, then the three numbers x, y, and z are evenly spaced on the number line (i.e., they are in arithmetic progression). The key to this observation is the fact that, in any set whose elements are in arithmetic progression (no matter how many or how few numbers are in the set), the median and mean are equal.

(1) INSUFFICIENT: Adding a number higher than a set's mean increases the mean, and adding a number lower than the set's mean will decrease the mean. (Adding a number equal to the mean will not alter the overall mean.) Therefore, this statement means that the number 4 is greater than the mean of the original set {x, y, z}. However, this fact gives no insight into whether x, y, z are in arithmetic progression.

Sample cases: {1, 2, 3} gives a YES answer, and {1, 2, 4} gives a NO answer.

(2) INSUFFICIENT: Adding a number lower than a set's median either decreases or does not change the median; adding a number higher than the set's median either increases or does not change the median. (Adding a number equal to the median will not change the median.) Therefore, this statement means that the number 4 is less than the median of the original set {x, y, z}. However, this fact gives no insight into whether x, y, z are in arithmetic progression.

Sample cases: {5, 6, 7} gives a YES answer, and {5, 6, 8} gives a NO answer.

(1) AND (2) SUFFICIENT: Both statements together show that (mean) < 4 < (median). This means that the mean and median are not equal, and so the set is not in arithmetic progression, which means that z - y can NOT equal y - x.

The correct answer is C.
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion