I think I was having the same confusion while preparing. I will suggest going with the GMAT preference and avoiding the use of "in that". Also, I think "for" can be used interchangeably in some cases with "because"; I have seen some examples of this use, but cannot recall exactly now.

vscid wrote:Which is the preferred 'conjunction' to use in sentences like this one amongst 'in that/because/for/on account of':

The Olympic Games helped to keep peace among the pugnacious states of the Greek world in that a sacred truce was proclaimed during the festival's month.

OG indicates that 'in that' is overly formal and hence should be avoided. However, I remember reading somewhere that 'in that' is preferred to 'because'. How about 'for' v/s 'because' ?

On the GMAT, avoid "in that" and "on account of" - those are both awkward constructions.

The tougher choice will be between "because of" and "due to".

Here's the general rule:

use "because of" if it allows you to answer a "why" question without a full sentence.

Why did the games help keep peace? Because of a truce.

"Due to" properly follows a version of the verb "to be"; for example:

The Yankees' loss was due to bad pitching.

Writing that same sentence with "because":

The Yankess lost because of bad pitching.

Stuart Kovinsky wrote:

vscid wrote:Which is the preferred 'conjunction' to use in sentences like this one amongst 'in that/because/for/on account of':

The Olympic Games helped to keep peace among the pugnacious states of the Greek world in that a sacred truce was proclaimed during the festival's month.

OG indicates that 'in that' is overly formal and hence should be avoided. However, I remember reading somewhere that 'in that' is preferred to 'because'. How about 'for' v/s 'because' ?

On the GMAT, avoid "in that" and "on account of" - those are both awkward constructions.

The tougher choice will be between "because of" and "due to".

Here's the general rule:

use "because of" if it allows you to answer a "why" question without a full sentence.

Why did the games help keep peace? Because of a truce.

"Due to" properly follows a version of the verb "to be"; for example:

The Yankees' loss was due to bad pitching.

Writing that same sentence with "because":

The Yankess lost because of bad pitching.

Ill add some more thoughts to allow for more clarity

'Due to' always means caused by>> eg Yankees lost due to rain>>caused by rain
Because of is a two word preposition always used before a noun or a pronoun>>eg because of you

ayushiiitm wrote:

Stuart Kovinsky wrote:

vscid wrote:Which is the preferred 'conjunction' to use in sentences like this one amongst 'in that/because/for/on account of':

The Olympic Games helped to keep peace among the pugnacious states of the Greek world in that a sacred truce was proclaimed during the festival's month.

OG indicates that 'in that' is overly formal and hence should be avoided. However, I remember reading somewhere that 'in that' is preferred to 'because'. How about 'for' v/s 'because' ?

On the GMAT, avoid "in that" and "on account of" - those are both awkward constructions.

The tougher choice will be between "because of" and "due to".

Here's the general rule:

use "because of" if it allows you to answer a "why" question without a full sentence.

Why did the games help keep peace? Because of a truce.

"Due to" properly follows a version of the verb "to be"; for example:

The Yankees' loss was due to bad pitching.

Writing that same sentence with "because":

The Yankess lost because of bad pitching.

Ill add some more thoughts to allow for more clarity

'Due to' always means caused by>> eg Yankees lost due to rain>>caused by rain
Because of is a two word preposition always used before a noun or a pronoun>>eg because of you

So 'Yankees lost because of rain' is incorrect?

vscid wrote: So 'Yankees lost because of rain' is incorrect?

Why did the Yankees lose?

Because of rain.

Nope, that's just fine.

Alternatively, you could say:

"Yankees' loss was due to rain."

In general terms:

They [did something] because of [something].

or

[Some event] was due to [something].

'in that' tells us in what sense something is true



Bob's childhood was unusual in that he had to do all the cooking.

These cities are alike in that they both have make great strides in eradicating poverty in the last 10 years.

The trip was remarkable in that there were absolutely no delays or mishaps.


I would not use 'because' in any of these examples.