BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Congress is debating a bill

Expert replies
by pesfunk » Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:34 pm
Congress is debating a bill requiring certain employers provide workers with unpaid leave so as to care for sick or newborn children.

A provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
B to provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
C provide workers with unpaid leave in order that they
D to provide workers with unpaid leave so that they can
E provide workers with unpaid leave and

[spoiler]Isn't D ambiguous pointing to both employers and workers ?

I chose B over D[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by vijaynaik » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:36 pm
SO AS TO is incorrect idiom.

So D is the better option. Even i felt 'they' is ambiguous. But i had to pick the best of the worst.
There must be some explanation to it :)
Join the discussion

by shovan85 » Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:07 pm
pesfunk wrote:Congress is debating a bill requiring certain employers provide workers with unpaid leave so as to care for sick or newborn children.

A provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
B to provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
C provide workers with unpaid leave in order that they
D to provide workers with unpaid leave so that they can
E provide workers with unpaid leave and

[spoiler]Isn't D ambiguous pointing to both employers and workers ?

I chose B over D[/spoiler]
This is NOT a test of subjunctive mood so we can discard A, C, and E.

As per B the usage of "so as to" is wrong. In GMAT correct usage of IDIOM is "so (adjective) as to (verb)".

The taste of the sauce was so spicy as to obliterate the taste of the food.

Answer is D. "They" seems ambiguous but it is not. I don't remember the video workshop by RON (Thursday with RON) but he said that the Pronoun ambiguity is tolerated in this kind of cases.

Here THEY refers to immediate Antecedent and which is the correct INTENDED meaning. It correctly refers to workers.

Suppose somehow if "They" would have refered back to Employers then the Ambiguity would not have been accepted.

Rule is: See the immediate Antecedent. Logically correct then it is not violation of Pronoun Ambiguity.
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
Join the discussion

by pesfunk » Thu Nov 18, 2010 12:46 am
Since we cannot measure the tolerable limit of GMAT, I guess I will then end up getting this wrong always.

shovan85 wrote:
pesfunk wrote:Congress is debating a bill requiring certain employers provide workers with unpaid leave so as to care for sick or newborn children.

A provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
B to provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
C provide workers with unpaid leave in order that they
D to provide workers with unpaid leave so that they can
E provide workers with unpaid leave and

[spoiler]Isn't D ambiguous pointing to both employers and workers ?

I chose B over D[/spoiler]
This is NOT a test of subjunctive mood so we can discard A, C, and E.

As per B the usage of "so as to" is wrong. In GMAT correct usage of IDIOM is "so (adjective) as to (verb)".

The taste of the sauce was so spicy as to obliterate the taste of the food.

Answer is D. "They" seems ambiguous but it is not. I don't remember the video workshop by RON (Thursday with RON) but he said that the Pronoun ambiguity is tolerated in this kind of cases.

Here THEY refers to immediate Antecedent and which is the correct INTENDED meaning. It correctly refers to workers.

Suppose somehow if "They" would have refered back to Employers then the Ambiguity would not have been accepted.

Rule is: See the immediate Antecedent. Logically correct then it is not violation of Pronoun Ambiguity.
Join the discussion


• Page 1 of 1