BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Congress has enacted legislation

Expert replies
by patanjali.purpose » Tue May 08, 2012 10:41 pm
Congress has enacted legislation forbidding state and local governments from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet for the next three years.

A) forbidding state and local governments from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet for the next three years

B) that forbids state and local governments for the next three years from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet

C) that for the next three years forbids state and local governments to raise taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet

D) forbidding for the next three years to state and local governments the raising of taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet

E) that forbids for the next three years state and local governments from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet

MGMAT OA-C

Pls explain the correct/incorrect usage of prepositional phrase "for the next three years". in each of the options.

Idiom error is known - and therefore you can ignore for our discussion
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by patanjali.purpose » Sun May 13, 2012 1:34 am
patanjali.purpose wrote:Congress has enacted legislation forbidding state and local governments from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet for the next three years.

A) forbidding state and local governments from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet for the next three years

B) that forbids state and local governments for the next three years from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet

C) that for the next three years forbids state and local governments to raise taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet

D) forbidding for the next three years to state and local governments the raising of taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet

E) that forbids for the next three years state and local governments from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet

MGMAT OA-C

Pls explain the correct/incorrect usage of prepositional phrase "for the next three years". in each of the options.

Idiom error is known - and therefore you can ignore for our discussion
I intend to learn an important concept about prepositional phrases - pls share your views/knowledge.

What does "for the next three years" modifies in A - does it modify IMMEDDIATE PRECEEDING NOUN ie INTERNET or IMMEDIATE PRECEEDING VERB ie LINK. Can we drop this choice because of the ambiguity with what does prep ph (for...years) modify?

Similarly can we say that in B - "for the next three years" can modify either FORBIDS or STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS and therefore ambiguous.

Such ambiguity is not there in C because "for the next three years" is sitting close to FORBIDS and not at all attached with (not near) STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. Is this a correct interpretation?
Join the discussion

by sam2304 » Sun May 13, 2012 4:50 am
patanjali.purpose wrote: Idiom error is known - and therefore you can ignore for our discussion

I intend to learn an important concept about prepositional phrases - pls share your views/knowledge.

What does "for the next three years" modifies in A - does it modify IMMEDDIATE PRECEEDING NOUN ie INTERNET or IMMEDIATE PRECEEDING VERB ie LINK. Can we drop this choice because of the ambiguity with what does prep ph (for...years) modify?
Prepositional phrases are either adverbs or adjectives. There is no ambiguity here, it modifies the verb 'link'. Whenever prepositional phrases act as adverb it modifies the verb. Here it helps to answer the question "how long ?" - Adverb of time
Similarly can we say that in B - "for the next three years" can modify either FORBIDS or STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS and therefore ambiguous.
No, there is no ambiguity here as well. The prepositional phrase helps us to answer the same question above and act as an adverb modifying the verb 'forbids'.
Such ambiguity is not there in C because "for the next three years" is sitting close to FORBIDS and not at all attached with (not near) STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. Is this a correct interpretation?
There is nothing wrong here as well as you say. Whenever prepositional phrases help describe a noun it modifies the noun similar to an adjective. Whenever prepositional phrases help us answer how, when, why, where - they modify the verb similar to an adverb. Hope this clears your doubts. :)
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:20 am
ok, the first thing to understand about prepositional phrases is that they can modify either nouns or actions -- and that it's ok to have a sentence that requires the reader to use common sense to make that distinction.

for instance, both of the following sentences are correct:
i read the book on the table (in which "on the table" modifies the noun "book")
i read the book on the subway (in which "on the subway" modifies the action of reading the book, not the book itself)
there's no contradiction here, even though these sentences work differently from each other, because the meaning is absolutely clear in each case. also, each prepositional phrase is placed as close as possible to the thing that it's actually describing.
What does "for the next three years" modifies in A - does it modify IMMEDDIATE PRECEEDING NOUN ie INTERNET or IMMEDIATE PRECEEDING VERB ie LINK. Can we drop this choice because of the ambiguity with what does prep ph (for...years) modify?
in the context of this sentence, it should be clear (by common sense, not by some grammar rule) that "for the next three years" must describe some verb/action.

the issue, then, is whether that prep phrase is placed close enough to that verb/action.

the problem with choice (a) is that "for the next three years" appears to be describing the action "link consumers to the internet". that's the wrong thing for the modifier to describe.
There is nothing wrong here as well as you say. Whenever prepositional phrases help describe a noun it modifies the noun similar to an adjective. Whenever prepositional phrases help us answer how, when, why, where - they modify the verb similar to an adverb. Hope this clears your doubts. :)
this is a nice summary.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Thu Jun 28, 2012 8:39 pm
lunarpower wrote:for instance, both of the following sentences are correct:
i read the book on the table (in which "on the table" modifies the noun "book")
i read the book on the subway (in which "on the subway" modifies the action of reading the book, not the book itself)
there's no contradiction here, even though these sentences work differently from each other, because the meaning is absolutely clear in each case. also, each prepositional phrase is placed as close as possible to the thing that it's actually describing.
Hi Ron Sir,

In the above example :

I read the book on the table. -- why "on the table" is considered only an adjective and not an adverb of place ?

I understand that it is logical that one cannot read the book sitting "on" the table, but still its not completely impossible. I think that "on the table" can act both as an adjective or an adverb of place.
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sun Jul 01, 2012 4:28 am
avik.ch wrote:I understand that it is logical that one cannot read the book sitting "on" the table, but still its not completely impossible. I think that "on the table" can act both as an adjective or an adverb of place.
avik, one of the most important fundamentals for this exam -- especially on critical reasoning, but also in interpreting SC sentences -- is the ability to understand what is reasonable. this does not mean "anything that's not completely impossible"; this means "dictated by common sense and normal human intuition".
common sense dictates that people don't sit on tables and read books. by contrast, it's perfectly reasonable to refer to a book that is sitting on a table. so, the latter interpretation is THE interpretation. the former interpretation is incorrect, because it isn't reasonable.

if you are going to allow any interpretation that has any non-zero possibility, even if it flies in the face of common sense, then the verbal section of this exam is not going to be much fun for you.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by mv12 » Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:05 am
So answer should be B right?
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:30 am
Given the OA as C, I am trying to find out how B and C differ?

Can anyone please help?
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:55 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote:Given the OA as C, I am trying to find out how B and C differ?

Can anyone please help?
B uses "forbid...from..." and C uses "forbid...to...". C is correct.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1