BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Confusing SC..

Expert replies
by rahulg83 » Sun May 24, 2009 8:22 am
Ideally, groups focused on environmental justice should be concerned with how new government projects will impact local populations. Specifically whether the projects would pose an unjust burden for lower-income and minority communities.



* will impact local populations. Specifically whether the projects would pose an unjust burden
* will impact local populations, specifically whether the projects would pose an unjust burden
* will impact local populations and pose an unjust burden
* will impact local populations and, specifically, pose an unjust burden
* will be impacting local populations and posing an unjust burden

OA B.
Can anybody explain why it is so? I chose D
[spoiler]OE states that D changes the meaning of the original sentence. I didn't quite understand how??[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: Confusing SC..

by Vemuri » Sun May 24, 2009 8:49 am
The author is trying to say that groups focused on environmental justice should be concerned with how new government projects will impact local populations and whether the projects would pose an unjust burden or not.

D - Does not consider the Yes & No options that the author is trying to convey.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sun May 24, 2009 3:28 pm
The specifically part dives deep on what the concern must be which is best presented by a comma followed by specifically

If we put an "and" its like saying they should be
1) concerned
2) and specifically

which will make no logical sense

IMO specifically is part of the same predicate after concerned and its not a seperate predicate(since its not describing something new about the subject or identifying some new action) so we dont need an AND
Join the discussion

by cata1yst » Mon May 25, 2009 9:42 am
In D..."will impact" and "pose" also don't allign.
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Tue May 26, 2009 9:35 pm
Ideally, groups focused on environmental justice should be concerned with how new government projects will impact local populations. Specifically whether the projects would pose an unjust burden for lower-income and minority communities.

How and whether should be used as both are raising a question here....

and , specifically is used as a continuation of the sentence..thus "," should be used....

Thus B...
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1