BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Confusing OA

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by mals24 » Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:14 pm
Even Im getting C

a-b+c>a+b-c?

You can cancel out 'a' from both sides. So you'll get c-b>b-c?
So basically the question is asking is c>b?

St 1 b is negative. No info about C INSUFF
St2: c is positive. No info about B INSUFF

1+2 we know b<c.


:?
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:24 pm
Answer should be C.

whats the source?
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:25 pm
my logic was absolutely similar.
Guess we are right about C
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:56 pm
OA should be C

looking at the question another way, it is asking
whether
-b +c > b -c ?
=> -(b -c) > b -c ?

This can only happen if we know b and c.

So C
Join the discussion

by hypik21 » Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:49 pm
unless i missed something, i got D

a-b+c > a+b-c

this comes to -b+c>b-c
c>2b-c
0>2b-2c

therefore c>b

a-(b-c)>a+(b-c)

a and subtracting any negative number will always be more than A + any negative number..however i am not sure if i have worked out the inequalities right.
Join the discussion

by beater » Mon Dec 22, 2008 2:06 pm
OA is definitely C. This is an OG problem. I've done OG so many damn times that I can guarantee that this question is between 80 - 100 in the 11th edition.
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:40 pm
if a, b, c are integers, is a-b+c>a+b-c?

(i)b<0
(ii) c>0

Since b is negatvie

so -b > b

add anything a -b > a+ b

now if we add c ( which can be both positive or negative we don't know)

so II is required to understand the sign of c.

IMO C

OA is wrong!!
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by hypik21 » Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:15 pm
ronniecoleman wrote:if a, b, c are integers, is a-b+c>a+b-c?

(i)b<0
(ii) c>0

Since b is negatvie

so -b > b

add anything a -b > a+ b

now if we add c ( which can be both positive or negative we don't know)

so II is required to understand the sign of c.

IMO C

OA is wrong!!
again, isnt a-(b-c)> a+(b-c)...we dont need any of the statements to figure that c>b..so b-c will always be negative...A minus a negative will be additive.
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:55 am
again, isnt a-(b-c)> a+(b-c)
No, a-(b-c)> a+(b-c) is not given in the question, ie it is not considered true. The question is asking you IF a-(b-c)> a+(b-c)?
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:59 am
IMO C...as everybdy calculated.
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:09 am
hypik21 wrote: again, isnt a-(b-c)> a+(b-c)...we dont need any of the statements to figure that c>b..so b-c will always be negative...A minus a negative will be additive.

Even with this, OA cant be "D" as you mentioned...

Infact, we have to answer this..and not take this as a fact
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Tue Dec 23, 2008 3:08 am
This question is from my prepcourses. I think I made a mistake when I wrote down answers.
However, my answer is simslar to uor Math Gurus! This means I am correct!
Join the discussion