kindly clear my confusion of the CR question below:
Karen : Compliance with new govt regulations requiring the installation of smoke alarms and sprinkler systems in all theaters and arenas will cost the Multiplex industry $25 billion annually. Consequently , jobs will be lost and profits diminished. Therefore, these regulations will harm the country's economy.
Lima : The $25 billion spent by some businesses will be revenue for others. Jobs and profits will be gained as well as lost.
Lima responds to Karen by -
i . Suggesting that Karen's argument overlooks a mitigating consequence.
ii. reinforcing Karen's conclusion by supplying a complementary interpretation of the evidence karen cites.
( I am assuming REINFORCING means strengthening , hence here Lima does actually say that , coz Lima adds another point to Karens conclusion, and not reject it totally ," Jobs and profits will be gained as well as lost" , so will this be a correct option for Lima's response )
Thank you in advance.
Sudeep Marik.
Karen : Compliance with new govt regulations requiring the installation of smoke alarms and sprinkler systems in all theaters and arenas will cost the Multiplex industry $25 billion annually. Consequently , jobs will be lost and profits diminished. Therefore, these regulations will harm the country's economy.
Lima : The $25 billion spent by some businesses will be revenue for others. Jobs and profits will be gained as well as lost.
Lima responds to Karen by -
i . Suggesting that Karen's argument overlooks a mitigating consequence.
ii. reinforcing Karen's conclusion by supplying a complementary interpretation of the evidence karen cites.
( I am assuming REINFORCING means strengthening , hence here Lima does actually say that , coz Lima adds another point to Karens conclusion, and not reject it totally ," Jobs and profits will be gained as well as lost" , so will this be a correct option for Lima's response )
Thank you in advance.
Sudeep Marik.
