BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Conditionality - Need expert thought

Expert replies
by voodoo_child » Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:08 pm
"Only girls with blue eyes are considered beautiful."

How can I diagram this statement? Thoughts?

I believe that possessing blue eyes is a sufficient condition. Hence, blue eyes -> beautiful. Am I correct?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Wed Jul 11, 2012 1:35 pm
This is a similar statement to "Only doctors are perceived as smart."
In this case the sentence defines a quality necessary for a condition to be fulfilled.
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

"¢ If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

"¢ Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

"¢ Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Join the discussion

by voodoo_child » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:54 pm
Kasia,
I am not sure what that means. But can you please reply in terms of diagram so that the picture is clear?
Join the discussion

by voodoo_child » Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:08 am
Can any of the experts help me? HELP!!!
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:34 pm
Your arrow diagram is backwards.

Blue eyes ---> Beautiful means that if you have blue eyes, you are considered beautiful. However, the original sentence does not say that blue eyes are sufficient to be considered beautiful. I would diagram it as:

Beautiful ---> Blue eyes. If you are considered beautiful, then you must have blue eyes.

For Kasia's example:

"Only doctors are perceived as smart." This does not mean that being a doctor is sufficient for being considered smart. The diagram would be:

Smart ---> Doctor. If you are perceived as smart, you must be a doctor.

In general, the relationship is:

Sufficient ---> Necessary
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by David@VeritasPrep » Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:12 pm
Bill is exactly right. The "only" goes with the necessary condition.

Was there a specific GMAT question that prompted you to look at formal logic?
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by voodoo_child » Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:15 am
Thanks Bill and David. I have memorized this structure. I recently came across an LSAT CR question that dealt with "only." I was lost with Nec/Suff question. Now, the question makes sense.


thanks for your help.
Join the discussion

by shekhar.kataria » Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:56 am
Hi Bill

I have a Question here

You said
Beautiful ---> Blue eyes. If you are considered beautiful, then you must have blue eyes.
Doubt :- Why cant it be Beautiful ---> A girl with a Blue eye.

IS it because there can be any other group and also there may not have blue eyes but are still considered beautiful.

Please confirm.
Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:Your arrow diagram is backwards.

Blue eyes ---> Beautiful means that if you have blue eyes, you are considered beautiful. However, the original sentence does not say that blue eyes are sufficient to be considered beautiful. I would diagram it as:

Beautiful ---> Blue eyes. If you are considered beautiful, then you must have blue eyes.

For Kasia's example:

"Only doctors are perceived as smart." This does not mean that being a doctor is sufficient for being considered smart. The diagram would be:

Smart ---> Doctor. If you are perceived as smart, you must be a doctor.

In general, the relationship is:

Sufficient ---> Necessary
Restlessness and discontent are the first necessities of progress.--Thomas A. Edison

If you find this post helpful, let me know by clicking thanks above :-)
Join the discussion

by 7777 » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:51 pm
voodoo_child wrote:"Only girls with blue eyes are considered beautiful."

How can I diagram this statement? Thoughts?

I believe that possessing blue eyes is a sufficient condition. Hence, blue eyes -> beautiful. Am I correct?
sufficient necessary
beautiful>>blue eyes

1 st correct inference==if a girl is beautiful she must be having blue eyes.
2nd correct inference== if a girl doesnt have blue eyes she wont be considered beautiful.


1 st wrong inference==if a girl has blue eyes, she will be considered beautiful.
2nd wrong inference== if a girl is not considered beautiful she doesnt have blue eyes.
Join the discussion