Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

conceptual one

Expert replies
by PAB2706 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:50 am
If x, y, and z are integers, and x < y < z, is z – y = y – x?

(1) The mean of the set {x, y, z, 4} is greater than the mean of the set {x, y, z}.
(2) The median of the set {x, y, z, 4} is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DanaJ » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:08 am
What you're actually trying to establish if the distance between z and y is equal to the distance between y and x.
z - y = y - x
z + x = 2y

1. tells you that 4 is greater than z, y and x. IMHO there's no other info to be obtained from this one.

2. the median of set {x, y, z} will of course be the middle value, or y.
The median of set {x, y, z, 4} cannot be established, since we don't know what the position of 4 is: is it greater than z? is is between y and z? We don't know.

But put both together to get that the median of set {x, y, z, 4} will be the average of the two middle values, y and z.
This means that y (the median of the smaller set) > (y + z)/2 (the median of the bigger set).

y > (y + z)/2
2y > y + z
y > z - contradicts the original assumption that x < y < z.

I might be missing something here... Maybe you guys can shed some light on this...
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Sat Jun 06, 2009 5:01 pm
The question is really asking if x, y and z are evenly spaced.

statement 1:
The mean of the set {x, y, z, 4} is greater than the mean of the set {x, y, z}.

(x+y+z+4)/4 > (x+y+z)/3
3x + 3y + 3z + 12 > 4x + 4y + 4z
x + y + z < 12

if x=1, y=2, z=3, then x, y and z are evenly spaced. YES.
if x=1, y=2, z=4, then x, y and z are not evenly spaced. NO.

statement 2: The median of the set {x, y, z, 4} is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}.

let's say the median of the set {x, y, z, 4} = M.

the median of set {x, y, z} must be y, since x<y<z.

we don't know where 4 is positioned relative to x, y and z. we could have either one of these 3 cases:

case 1: x <= 4 <= z

in this case, M = (4+y)/2, and from statement 2 we have:

(4+y)/2 < y
4+y < 2y
y > 4

we still have insufficient info to answer the question stem. insufficient.

case 2: 4 < x

in this case, M = (x+y)/2, and from statement 2 we have:

(x+y)/2 < y
x + y < 2y
y > x

we know already know this from the question stem. insufficient.

case 3: 4 > z

in this case, M = (y+z)/2, and from statement 2 we have:

(y+z)/2 < y
z + y < 2y
z < y

this case is not possible since we know that z must be greater than y.

hence, statement 2 on its own is insufficient.

both statements together:


x + y + z < 12

4 < y (from case 1)

since y>4, the the minimum possible value for y is 5. if y = 5, then z must be at least 6. so now we have y + z = 11, which means x must 0 or less (in order to satisfy statement 1). clearly, x, y and z are not evenly spaced. sufficient.

choose C.


I hope I didnt miss anything.

-BM-
Join the discussion

by PAB2706 » Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:04 am
BM tht is coool.....this was one of the 700-800 level questions tht i got on my mgmat test....i got the answer right but i just marked it bcos of a hunch...

nd yes the answer is C..

cool approach.
Join the discussion

by yogami » Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:24 am
Thats the thing. I took exactly the same approach with this one but that was because I am doing manhattan stuff too. When you do manhattan you know that you need to be careful with every single question. But when you are doing GMATPrep or PowerPrep or actual GMAT and if this kind of a question comes at the end of the test, or at a point where your mind is tired then you might just chose a B or an E. This tells me that I need to approach every test I take, no matter how hard or easy with the
"manhattan-level" mindset. The problem with this mindset is that you might spend a little bit of an extra time on 400-500 level DS questions.
200 or 800. It don't matter no more.
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:46 am
That's a really nice approach, BM! Didn't think of that one... Guess I only picked case 3...
Join the discussion