BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

conceptual one

Expert replies
by PAB2706 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:50 am
If x, y, and z are integers, and x < y < z, is z – y = y – x?

(1) The mean of the set {x, y, z, 4} is greater than the mean of the set {x, y, z}.
(2) The median of the set {x, y, z, 4} is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DanaJ » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:08 am
What you're actually trying to establish if the distance between z and y is equal to the distance between y and x.
z - y = y - x
z + x = 2y

1. tells you that 4 is greater than z, y and x. IMHO there's no other info to be obtained from this one.

2. the median of set {x, y, z} will of course be the middle value, or y.
The median of set {x, y, z, 4} cannot be established, since we don't know what the position of 4 is: is it greater than z? is is between y and z? We don't know.

But put both together to get that the median of set {x, y, z, 4} will be the average of the two middle values, y and z.
This means that y (the median of the smaller set) > (y + z)/2 (the median of the bigger set).

y > (y + z)/2
2y > y + z
y > z - contradicts the original assumption that x < y < z.

I might be missing something here... Maybe you guys can shed some light on this...
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Sat Jun 06, 2009 5:01 pm
The question is really asking if x, y and z are evenly spaced.

statement 1:
The mean of the set {x, y, z, 4} is greater than the mean of the set {x, y, z}.

(x+y+z+4)/4 > (x+y+z)/3
3x + 3y + 3z + 12 > 4x + 4y + 4z
x + y + z < 12

if x=1, y=2, z=3, then x, y and z are evenly spaced. YES.
if x=1, y=2, z=4, then x, y and z are not evenly spaced. NO.

statement 2: The median of the set {x, y, z, 4} is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}.

let's say the median of the set {x, y, z, 4} = M.

the median of set {x, y, z} must be y, since x<y<z.

we don't know where 4 is positioned relative to x, y and z. we could have either one of these 3 cases:

case 1: x <= 4 <= z

in this case, M = (4+y)/2, and from statement 2 we have:

(4+y)/2 < y
4+y < 2y
y > 4

we still have insufficient info to answer the question stem. insufficient.

case 2: 4 < x

in this case, M = (x+y)/2, and from statement 2 we have:

(x+y)/2 < y
x + y < 2y
y > x

we know already know this from the question stem. insufficient.

case 3: 4 > z

in this case, M = (y+z)/2, and from statement 2 we have:

(y+z)/2 < y
z + y < 2y
z < y

this case is not possible since we know that z must be greater than y.

hence, statement 2 on its own is insufficient.

both statements together:


x + y + z < 12

4 < y (from case 1)

since y>4, the the minimum possible value for y is 5. if y = 5, then z must be at least 6. so now we have y + z = 11, which means x must 0 or less (in order to satisfy statement 1). clearly, x, y and z are not evenly spaced. sufficient.

choose C.


I hope I didnt miss anything.

-BM-
Join the discussion

by PAB2706 » Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:04 am
BM tht is coool.....this was one of the 700-800 level questions tht i got on my mgmat test....i got the answer right but i just marked it bcos of a hunch...

nd yes the answer is C..

cool approach.
Join the discussion

by yogami » Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:24 am
Thats the thing. I took exactly the same approach with this one but that was because I am doing manhattan stuff too. When you do manhattan you know that you need to be careful with every single question. But when you are doing GMATPrep or PowerPrep or actual GMAT and if this kind of a question comes at the end of the test, or at a point where your mind is tired then you might just chose a B or an E. This tells me that I need to approach every test I take, no matter how hard or easy with the
"manhattan-level" mindset. The problem with this mindset is that you might spend a little bit of an extra time on 400-500 level DS questions.
200 or 800. It don't matter no more.
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:46 am
That's a really nice approach, BM! Didn't think of that one... Guess I only picked case 3...
Join the discussion