BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Complicated formula

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
by r_walid » Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:14 am
what is the following equal to?

sqrt [ 2xsqrt(63) + 2/(8 + 3xsqrt(7) ) ]


the answer isn't as important as to find a way to quickly solve this. I know there is a trick, but i can't seem to find it.

thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by mp2437 » Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:56 am
Answer is 4. I don't see a shorter way to solve this then by figuring out like terms, and then rationalizing the denominator.

Step 1: Look at what is on the inside. 2*sqrt(63) can be rewritten as 6*sqrt(7), and when you add that to 2/(8+3*sqrt(7)), you need to have a common denominator or 8+3*sqrt(7).

Step 2: from step 1, you will get the following term:

[(6*sqrt(7)*(8+3*sqrt(7)) + 2]/(8+3*sqrt(7))

This comes out to (48*sqrt(7) + 128)/(8+3*sqrt(7)).

Step 3: Now you need to rationalize denominator, so multiply both the numerator and denominator by (8-3*sqrt(7)).

This gives you (48*sqrt(7) + 128)*(8 - 3*sqrt(7)) / 1. You get 1 in the denominator after the rationalization (8+3*sqrt(7))*(8-3*sqrt(7)) = 64 - 3*3*7 = 64 - 63 = 1

Step 4: Doing in the arithmetic in the numerator will give you a numerator of 16 (go carefully). So final step is that you have square root over the entire term, so sqrt(16) = 4.
Join the discussion

by r_walid » Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:08 am
mp2437 wrote:Answer is 4. I don't see a shorter way to solve this then by figuring out like terms, and then rationalizing the denominator.

Step 1: Look at what is on the inside. 2*sqrt(63) can be rewritten as 6*sqrt(7), and when you add that to 2/(8+3*sqrt(7)), you need to have a common denominator or 8+3*sqrt(7).

Step 2: from step 1, you will get the following term:

[(6*sqrt(7)*(8+3*sqrt(7)) + 2]/(8+3*sqrt(7))

This comes out to (48*sqrt(7) + 128)/(8+3*sqrt(7)).

Step 3: Now you need to rationalize denominator, so multiply both the numerator and denominator by (8-3*sqrt(7)).

This gives you (48*sqrt(7) + 128)*(8 - 3*sqrt(7)) / 1. You get 1 in the denominator after the rationalization (8+3*sqrt(7))*(8-3*sqrt(7)) = 64 - 3*3*7 = 64 - 63 = 1

Step 4: Doing in the arithmetic in the numerator will give you a numerator of 16 (go carefully). So final step is that you have square root over the entire term, so sqrt(16) = 4.


Thank you. but don't you think there has to be a faster way? step 4 takes forever to do, there has to be a trick that will help solve step 4 in a fast way. any thoughts anyone?
Join the discussion