BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Complicated absolute value

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kobel51 » Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:57 pm
I'll be looking forward to this explanation as well. This is a tough question. what is the source?
Join the discussion

by mjjking » Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:29 pm
At first I was confused too, but it simply requires you to pick numbers.

try for instance:

stmt 1.

4/4 =1 holds
-2/2 = -1 not right
1/2 / 1/2 =1 not right
-1/2 / 1/2 = -1 holds

So we find that to satisfy stmt 1 x could either be >1 or -1<x<0.

Stmt 2 tells us what we need to add to stmt 1 to get C as answer.

Hope this helps!
Beat The GMAT - 1st priority
Enter a top MBA program - 2nd priority
Loving my wife: MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL!

REAL THING 1 (AUG 2007): 680 (Q43, V40)
REAL THING 2 (APR 2009): 720 (Q47, V41)
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:44 pm
@El Cucu,
R u sure that u posted the entire question?
I think u missed "X is not equal to 0" Otherwise stmt 1 will fail and GMAC avoids infinity/indeterminate values.
Next time pls copy the problem entirely.

Let me assume that x is != 0 and solve the problem. (here ! implies "not")

stmt 1.
x/|x| < x

since x != 0, we can cross multiply.
x < x* |x|-----------------------1

case 1. x is +ve.

we can divide by x and < sign will remain the same.
so we get 1 < |x|

ie 1 < x (coz x is +ve)

case 2: x is -ve.
< will become ">"

Dividing by x,
1 > |x|

Now x is -ve so we get 1 > -x or -1 < x < 0 ( x < 0 coz we assumed that x is negative.. in case 2)

combining case 1 and 2. we get.
x > 1 OR -1 < x < 0 ====> ambiguous
Hence stmt 1 is insufficient.


stmt 2.

x < |x|

again .. intuitively one can say that x has to be -ve. for this to be true.

eg. let x = -2
so -2 < |-2| ==> -2 < 2 OK.
But it just says that x is -ve and nothing else. hence insufficent

Combining 1 and 2.

Apply x is -ve from stmt 2 to stmt 1.
we get -1 < x < 0.

hence x < 1

Answer is C.

HT Helps
Join the discussion

by El Cucu » Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:31 am
I see now that the part x is different from 0 was blurred in the sheet, that's why I couldn't post it in the statement. Sorry for that. All the best
Join the discussion