BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Complex absolute value question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by UmanG » Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:44 pm
Hi,

My answer is B. Explaination is as follow,

1. Y < X,

Here if both X & Y holds the same sign either positive or negative will change the above equation to |X-Y| = |X| - |Y|

And if both have oppsite signs then since Y < X it holds the equation,
|X-Y| > |X| - |Y|

It means this option gives us |X-Y| >= |X| - |Y|.

Stetement 1 alone is NOT SUFFICIENT.

2. XY<0

This equation tells us that X & Y has oppsite signs.

Now for +ve X & -ve Y
|X-(-Y)| > |X| - |(-Y)|
--> |X+Y| > |X| - |Y|-----------(A)
(clearly X+Y in either condition will grater then X-Y.)

Or for -ve X & +ve Y
|(-X)-Y| > |(-X)| - |Y|
--> |-X-Y| > |X| - |Y|
--> |X+Y| > |X| - |Y|-----------(B)
(Same as A)

Thus using stetement 2, in either condition (+ve X & -ve Y, -ve X & +ve Y)we clearly able to say that |X-Y| > |X| - |Y|.

And so stetement 2 alone is SUFFICIENT.
Thanks,
UmanG - restless mind..
Join the discussion

by mbaapp07 » Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:14 am
Uman is absolutely right...
Join the discussion

by singhpreet1 » Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:49 pm
cant understand the solution..i felt A alone was sufficient..would someone probe into this..or is it too old a problem to be looked into!??
Join the discussion

by Haaress » Wed Jun 16, 2010 2:26 pm
|X-Y| > |X| - |Y|

1. Y < X

Plug ins works well with this one.
|X-Y| > |X| - |Y|
3 cases.
X is +ve and Y is +ve eg |5-2| > |5| - |2| .. No
X is +ve and Y is -ve eg |5-(-2)| > |5| - |-2| ... Yes
X is -ve and Y is -ve eg |-2-(-5)| > |-2| - |-5|...Yes

So Insufficient

2. XY<0

2 Cases
X is +ve and Y is -ve eg |5-(-2)| > |5| - |-2| ... Yes
X is -ve and Y is +ve eg |-5 - 2| > |-5| - | 2| ... Yes

So sufficient. Thus B.
Join the discussion

by mj78ind » Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:34 am
UmanG wrote:Hi,


2. XY<0

This equation tells us that X & Y has oppsite signs.

Now for +ve X & -ve Y
|X-(-Y)| > |X| - |(-Y)|
--> |X+Y| > |X| - |Y|-----------(A)

(clearly X+Y in either condition will grater then X-Y.)

Or for -ve X & +ve Y
|(-X)-Y| > |(-X)| - |Y|
--> |-X-Y| > |X| - |Y|
--> |X+Y| > |X| - |Y|-----------(B)
(Same as A)

Thus using stetement 2, in either condition (+ve X & -ve Y, -ve X & +ve Y)we clearly able to say that |X-Y| > |X| - |Y|.

And so stetement 2 alone is SUFFICIENT.
Slight modification, if y <0, then abs(x-y) = abs(x) + abs(y) ......which is always greater than abs(x) - abs(y)
Join the discussion