BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

comparison: "a greater proportion than it was"

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:08 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 3 times
by clawhammer » Sat Dec 04, 2010 7:55 am
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

(A) a greater proportion than it was
(B) a greater proportion than
(C) a greater proportion than they have been
(D) which is greater than was so
(E) which is greater than it has been

Can someone explain why A ('it was') is wrong?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:44 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 14 times

by ronaldramlan » Sat Dec 04, 2010 8:39 am
A is incorrect because the pronoun "it" does not have a clear antecedent. What the sentence is trying to say is, the proportion of television costs in the presidential campaign of 1992 is greater than (that) in any previous election. Thus, choice B is correct.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 3:21 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:780

by nazar7ft » Sat Dec 04, 2010 8:48 am
clawhammer wrote:Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

(A) a greater proportion than it was
(B) a greater proportion than
(C) a greater proportion than they have been
(D) which is greater than was so
(E) which is greater than it has been

Can someone explain why A ('it was') is wrong?
General:

If you find any pronoun that has more than one potential antecedents, you should eliminate it. This type of pronouns are ambiguous.

Specific:

It MUST have a singular antecedent. There are two singular nouns: "spending" and "campaign". If you replace "it" with either of these, you find the followings:

A greater proportion than spending was....
A greater proportion than the campaign was....

So, there are two potential antecedents of "it"; therefore, it is ambiguous. We should eliminate it.

Thanks.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:08 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 3 times

by clawhammer » Sat Dec 04, 2010 7:10 pm
Thanks all! I was just thinking, since it already states "a greater proportion", is it still ambiguous?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:48 am

by vietmoi999 » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:58 pm
clawhammer wrote:Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

(A) a greater proportion than it was
(B) a greater proportion than
(C) a greater proportion than they have been
(D) which is greater than was so
(E) which is greater than it has been

Can someone explain why A ('it was') is wrong?
I agree B is best

but I do not understand the full version of B. Please, make full choice B. (of course, B is an ellipsis)

pls, help. Thank
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:48 am

by vietmoi999 » Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:14 am
very hard one.
I agree B is best.

B is an ellipsis. and I want to make B full. I do not understand the latter half of comparison in B.
If anyone in this gmat forum is in England, pls email to me([email protected]) . I have some problems and need your advise. Thank a lot
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1