BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

company

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by liferocks » Wed May 19, 2010 4:58 am
let x be the number of application recommended by 2 person and y be the number of application recommended by 3 persons
for max common recomendation,
hence 30+x+2y=15+17+20 or x+2y=22

maximum y is 11..so 3 people can recommend at MAX 11

Not sure if the question is correct.Can you please check.
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Wed May 19, 2010 5:05 am
liferocks wrote:let x be the number of application recommended by 2 person and y be the number of application recommended by 3 persons
for max common recomendation,
hence 30+x+2y=15+17+20 or x+2y=22

maximum y is 11..so 3 people can recommend at MAX 11

Not sure if the question is correct.Can you please check.
What exactly is happening here or do I really need rest now?
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Wed May 19, 2010 5:16 am
sanju09 wrote:
liferocks wrote:let x be the number of application recommended by 2 person and y be the number of application recommended by 3 persons
for max common recomendation,
hence 30+x+2y=15+17+20 or x+2y=22

maximum y is 11..so 3 people can recommend at MAX 11

Not sure if the question is correct.Can you please check.
What exactly is happening here or do I really need rest now?
The question says first person can recommend 15 , second can 17 and third can 20,,but it does not says what is the minimum applications any person can recommended .So we can get what is the maximum recommendations not the minimum. That's why I thought question might not be correct .
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Wed May 19, 2010 5:58 am
liferocks wrote:
sanju09 wrote:
liferocks wrote:let x be the number of application recommended by 2 person and y be the number of application recommended by 3 persons
for max common recomendation,
hence 30+x+2y=15+17+20 or x+2y=22

maximum y is 11..so 3 people can recommend at MAX 11


Not sure if the question is correct.Can you please check.
What exactly is happening here or do I really need rest now?
The question says first person can recommend 15 , second can 17 and third can 20,,but it does not says what is the minimum applications any person can recommended .So we can get what is the maximum recommendations not the minimum. That's why I thought question might not be correct .
The posted stuff has no doubt more than one shortcoming that avert us to call it a genuine GMAT PS, but I am asking what has made you write what's in bold above, what was your previous interpretation like, and hence what!!
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Wed May 19, 2010 9:18 am
sanju09 wrote:
liferocks wrote:
sanju09 wrote:
liferocks wrote:let x be the number of application recommended by 2 person and y be the number of application recommended by 3 persons
for max common recomendation,
hence 30+x+2y=15+17+20 or x+2y=22

maximum y is 11..so 3 people can recommend at MAX 11


Not sure if the question is correct.Can you please check.
What exactly is happening here or do I really need rest now?
The question says first person can recommend 15 , second can 17 and third can 20,,but it does not says what is the minimum applications any person can recommended .So we can get what is the maximum recommendations not the minimum. That's why I thought question might not be correct .
The posted stuff has no doubt more than one shortcoming that avert us to call it a genuine GMAT PS, but I am asking what has made you write what's in bold above, what was your previous interpretation like, and hence what!!
ok..this is how I got it

Since first person can recommend 15 , second can 17 and third can 20 maximum number of recomendation is 15+17+20=52

this will contain all application that has only one reco+ 2* all application that has two reco+ 3* all application that has 3 reco

which is nothing but 30+x+2y as per mentioned conventions

so 30+x+2y=52 or x+2y=22
now here if we want to maximize y,which is number of applications with 3 reco,x has to be minimised..minimum possible number is 0 and hence max y=11
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Wed May 19, 2010 11:57 pm
liferocks wrote:
sanju09 wrote:
liferocks wrote:
sanju09 wrote:
liferocks wrote:let x be the number of application recommended by 2 person and y be the number of application recommended by 3 persons
for max common recomendation,
hence 30+x+2y=15+17+20 or x+2y=22

maximum y is 11..so 3 people can recommend at MAX 11


Not sure if the question is correct.Can you please check.
What exactly is happening here or do I really need rest now?
The question says first person can recommend 15 , second can 17 and third can 20,,but it does not says what is the minimum applications any person can recommended .So we can get what is the maximum recommendations not the minimum. That's why I thought question might not be correct .
The posted stuff has no doubt more than one shortcoming that avert us to call it a genuine GMAT PS, but I am asking what has made you write what's in bold above, what was your previous interpretation like, and hence what!!
ok..this is how I got it

Since first person can recommend 15 , second can 17 and third can 20 maximum number of recomendation is 15+17+20=52

this will contain all application that has only one reco+ 2* all application that has two reco+ 3* all application that has 3 reco

which is nothing but 30+x+2y as per mentioned conventions


so 30+x+2y=52 or x+2y=22
now here if we want to maximize y,which is number of applications with 3 reco,x has to be minimised..minimum possible number is 0 and hence max y=11
...and what are x and y there?
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Thu May 20, 2010 12:50 am
sanju09 wrote:
liferocks wrote:
sanju09 wrote:
liferocks wrote:
sanju09 wrote:
liferocks wrote:let x be the number of application recommended by 2 person and y be the number of application recommended by 3 persons
for max common recomendation,
hence 30+x+2y=15+17+20 or x+2y=22

maximum y is 11..so 3 people can recommend at MAX 11


Not sure if the question is correct.Can you please check.
What exactly is happening here or do I really need rest now?
The question says first person can recommend 15 , second can 17 and third can 20,,but it does not says what is the minimum applications any person can recommended .So we can get what is the maximum recommendations not the minimum. That's why I thought question might not be correct .
The posted stuff has no doubt more than one shortcoming that avert us to call it a genuine GMAT PS, but I am asking what has made you write what's in bold above, what was your previous interpretation like, and hence what!!
ok..this is how I got it

Since first person can recommend 15 , second can 17 and third can 20 maximum number of recomendation is 15+17+20=52

this will contain all application that has only one reco+ 2* all application that has two reco+ 3* all application that has 3 reco

which is nothing but 30+x+2y as per mentioned conventions


so 30+x+2y=52 or x+2y=22
now here if we want to maximize y,which is number of applications with 3 reco,x has to be minimised..minimum possible number is 0 and hence max y=11
...and what are x and y there?
x is all application that has two reco
y is ll application that has 3 reco
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Thu May 20, 2010 1:12 am
x is all application that has two reco
y is ll application that has 3 reco
then why isn't it matching with...
this will contain all application that has only one reco+ 2* all application that has two reco+ 3* all application that has 3 reco

which is nothing but 30+x+2y as per mentioned conventions
?
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Thu May 20, 2010 2:46 am
sanju09 wrote:
x is all application that has two reco
y is ll application that has 3 reco
then why isn't it matching with...
this will contain all application that has only one reco+ 2* all application that has two reco+ 3* all application that has 3 reco

which is nothing but 30+x+2y as per mentioned conventions
?
that is because

all application that has only one reco+ 2* all application that has two reco+3* all application that has 3 reco =
[application that has only one reco+all application that has two reco+all application that has 3 reco]+1*all application that has two reco+2*all application that has 3 reco =
Total number of applicant+1*all application that has two reco+2*all application that has 3 reco=30+x+2*y
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion