BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GMAT 800

Expert replies
by vishalogy » Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:31 pm
Recent studies have shown that there are now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many than there were even five years ago.

(A) there are now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many than there were

(B) there are now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many there were

(C) there is now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many than there was

(D) there is now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, but that ratio is much lower than

(E) there is now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many as there were
wish
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by dumb.doofus » Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:29 pm
IMO E

Correct idiom "as many as" also singular usage is required.. "there is one teacher "
One love, one blood, one life. You got to do what you should.
https://dreambigdreamhigh.blocked/
https://gmattoughies.blocked/
Join the discussion

Re: GMAT 800

by mooreliberty » Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:50 pm
vishalogy wrote:Recent studies have shown that there are now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many than there were even five years ago.

(A) there are now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many than there were

(B) there are now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many there were

(C) there is now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many than there was

(D) there is now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, but that ratio is much lower than

(E) there is now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many as there were
IMO - between D & E.

I'm leaning towards D because "but that ratio..." provides a clear subject of comparison and "much lower than" is correct idiomatically. E sounds correct, but after taking it apart, I am unclear as to what "as many as" is referring to -- students or teachers?
Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice; moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. - Barry Goldwater

(Inspired by Thomas Paine in The Rights of Man).
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:00 pm
IMO - between D & E.

I'm leaning towards D because "but that ratio..." provides a clear subject of comparison and "much lower than" is correct idiomatically. E sounds correct, but after taking it apart, I am unclear as to what "as many as" is referring to -- students or teachers?
IMO-D
what is the OA?
Join the discussion

by montz » Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:20 pm
IMO E.

Isn't D (incorrectly) comparing 'ratio' with 'five years'?
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:03 pm
IMO E coz the correct idiom is as many as.. in D ratio is being compared with five years.. hence incorrect..
Guys, please lemme know whether there is any case in which "as many" is correct.. such as used in B here..
Join the discussion

by real2008 » Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:49 pm
OA please?
Join the discussion

by imhimanshu » Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:11 am
I;lgo with E.....as many as is the correct idion also in D comparison isnt correct...ratio is gettn compared with time frame
Join the discussion

by nikhilkatira » Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:07 am
OA ?
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:51 am
IMO E
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by david2008 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:12 am
My vote is for D

I think E is ambiguous in referencing the "not nearly as many as there were" ... does it refer to teachers or students?
Join the discussion

by kris610 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:07 pm
IMO E.

In D, the comparison "but the ratio is much lower than even five years ago" does not make sense -- ratio is compared to what here?

ratio is much lower than what it was five years ago would have made sense.
Join the discussion

by real2008 » Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:12 am
Where is vishalogy? U please post the OA.
Join the discussion

Re: GMAT 800

by mooreliberty » Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:24 am
vishalogy wrote:Recent studies have shown that there are now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many than there were even five years ago.

(A) there are now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many than there were

(B) there are now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many there were

(C) there is now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many than there was

(D) there is now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, but that ratio is much lower than

(E) there is now one teacher for every thirty-one students in California's elementary schools, not nearly as many as there were

Dont know where he went ... The OA according to Kaplan is E. Please see attached file.
Attachments
gmat800answer.JPG
Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice; moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. - Barry Goldwater

(Inspired by Thomas Paine in The Rights of Man).
Join the discussion

by karmayogi » Tue Jul 28, 2009 10:16 am
Not very convinced with the following line in the explanation: "The subject for 'there were' later in the sentence is an implied teachers"

At least, I was unable to figure that (the implied meaning) out.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
Join the discussion