BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Comedians... Tough one...

Expert replies
by nervesofsteel » Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:11 am
All of the best comedians have had unhappy childhoods. Yet, many people who have had happy childhoods are good comedians, and some good comedians who have had miserably unhappy childhoods are happy adults.
If the statements in the passage are true, which one of the following CANNOT be true?

(A) The proportion of good comedians who had unhappy childhoods is greater than the proportion of the best comedians who did.
(B) Some good comedians have had unhappy childhoods and are unhappy adults.
(C) Most of the best comedians are happy adults.
(D) More good comedians have had unhappy childhoods than have had happy childhoods.
(E) The proportion of comedians who are happy adults is higher than the proportion who are unhappy adults.

OA A
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by bignasty666 » Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:59 am
obviously A.. as were talking proprtions here...
Join the discussion

by pandeyvineet24 » Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:17 am
I picked B. This was really tough
bignasty666 wrote:obviously A.. as were talking proprtions here...
The thing which i am struggling to get hold of is How can we know the proportions of the 2 different group from the question stem ?

"All of the best comedians have had unhappy childhoods. Yet, many people who have had happy childhoods are good comedians"
Join the discussion

Re: Comedians... Tough one...

by bignasty666 » Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:25 am
nervesofsteel wrote:All of the best comedians have had unhappy childhoods. Yet, many people who have had happy childhoods are good comedians, and some good comedians who have had miserably unhappy childhoods are happy adults.
If the statements in the passage are true, which one of the following CANNOT be true?

(A) The proportion of good comedians who had unhappy childhoods is greater than the proportion of the best comedians who did.
(B) Some good comedians have had unhappy childhoods and are unhappy adults.
(C) Most of the best comedians are happy adults.
(D) More good comedians have had unhappy childhoods than have had happy childhoods.
(E) The proportion of comedians who are happy adults is higher than the proportion who are unhappy adults.

OA A
vineet as u can see the q is asking which CANNOT be true..A says proportion of good comedians who had UNHAPPY childhoods is greater than proprtion of best comedians..
The stem says all best comedians had unhappy childhood WHICH MEANS 100%...OR 1/1 IN TERMS OF PROPRTION..the stem also says that some good comedians had happy chilldhoods ..from this we deduce the "good comedians" have had proprtionately less unhappy childhoods than the best comedians as clearly it cannot be 100% or proportion wise 1/1...hence A cannot be true. :)

im sorry i suck at explaining this is the best i can do
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:14 am
yes i got it now..

Thanks
Join the discussion

by bignasty666 » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:20 am
nervesofsteel wrote:yes i got it now..

Thanks
rep me dude :lol:
Join the discussion

by amazonviper » Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:07 pm
Yeah I chose A right away and I did not read the other choices. Good explanation Bugnasty. Saved me from typing the same stuff :D
__________________________________

Winners never quit..Quitters never win !!
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:48 pm
I would go with option A as the correct option
Join the discussion