BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

college graduates

Expert replies
by reachac » Mon Jun 23, 2008 6:47 am
In the 1970’s there was an oversupply of college graduates. The oversupply caused the average annual income of college graduates to fall to a level only 18 percent greater than that of workers with only high school diplomas. By the late 1980’s the average annual income of college graduates was 43 percent higher than that of workers with only high school diplomas, even though between the 1970’s and the late 1980’s the supply of college graduates did not decrease.
Which of the following, if true, in the late 1980’s, best reconciles the apparent discrepancy described above?
(A) The economy slowed, thus creating a decreased demand for college graduates.
(B) The quality of high school education improved.
(C) Compared to the 1970’s, a greater number of high schools offered vocational guidance programs for their students.
(D) The proportion of the population with at least a college-level education increased.
(E) There was for the first time in 20 years an oversupply of job seekers with only high school diplomas.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by niraj_a » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:20 am
Join the discussion

by durgesh79 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:27 am
IMO E

1970 oversupply of college grads --> salary of college grads goes down -->income diff between gollege grad and high schoold diploma goes down

late 1980 oeversupply of high school diploma --> salary of highschool diploma goes down --> income diff between gollege grad and high schoold diploma goes up
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:32 am
yeah, i too had to choose between D and E, I guess D assumes too much afterall...
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:33 am
My pick E.

Same reasoning as Durgesh's

The number of people available in a particular category increases and there are more people willing to work in that category. Employers can cherry pick whom they want and the increased competition drives down wages. Even if the Graduates pay remained same, the other category might have fallen so much that the difference is now 43%
Please do not post answer along with the Question you post/ask

Let people discuss the Questions with out seeing answers.
Join the discussion

by reachac » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:43 am
OA is E.

I picked D though.

E) There was for the first time in 20 years an oversupply of job seekers with only high school diplomas.....

wat confused me in E was the part "first time in 20 years" as though the 43% difference was seen only in one particular year.

Can anyone elaborate the thought process behind E, specially refering to the bold part.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by durgesh79 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:54 am
Actually this bold part makes Option D very strong ....

it tells that this oversupply of highschool diploma dint happen in 1970 .... so the salaries of highschool diploma guys were good (relatively)

May be the purpose of this bold part is just to trap .... someone might think that there is no reference of "20 years" in the question so this option is out of scope.....
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Tue May 10, 2016 11:59 pm
Looking at it now, E makes sense
Join the discussion