BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

college graduates

Expert replies
by reachac » Mon Jun 23, 2008 6:47 am
In the 1970’s there was an oversupply of college graduates. The oversupply caused the average annual income of college graduates to fall to a level only 18 percent greater than that of workers with only high school diplomas. By the late 1980’s the average annual income of college graduates was 43 percent higher than that of workers with only high school diplomas, even though between the 1970’s and the late 1980’s the supply of college graduates did not decrease.
Which of the following, if true, in the late 1980’s, best reconciles the apparent discrepancy described above?
(A) The economy slowed, thus creating a decreased demand for college graduates.
(B) The quality of high school education improved.
(C) Compared to the 1970’s, a greater number of high schools offered vocational guidance programs for their students.
(D) The proportion of the population with at least a college-level education increased.
(E) There was for the first time in 20 years an oversupply of job seekers with only high school diplomas.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by niraj_a » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:20 am
Join the discussion

by durgesh79 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:27 am
IMO E

1970 oversupply of college grads --> salary of college grads goes down -->income diff between gollege grad and high schoold diploma goes down

late 1980 oeversupply of high school diploma --> salary of highschool diploma goes down --> income diff between gollege grad and high schoold diploma goes up
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:32 am
yeah, i too had to choose between D and E, I guess D assumes too much afterall...
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:33 am
My pick E.

Same reasoning as Durgesh's

The number of people available in a particular category increases and there are more people willing to work in that category. Employers can cherry pick whom they want and the increased competition drives down wages. Even if the Graduates pay remained same, the other category might have fallen so much that the difference is now 43%
Please do not post answer along with the Question you post/ask

Let people discuss the Questions with out seeing answers.
Join the discussion

by reachac » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:43 am
OA is E.

I picked D though.

E) There was for the first time in 20 years an oversupply of job seekers with only high school diplomas.....

wat confused me in E was the part "first time in 20 years" as though the 43% difference was seen only in one particular year.

Can anyone elaborate the thought process behind E, specially refering to the bold part.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by durgesh79 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:54 am
Actually this bold part makes Option D very strong ....

it tells that this oversupply of highschool diploma dint happen in 1970 .... so the salaries of highschool diploma guys were good (relatively)

May be the purpose of this bold part is just to trap .... someone might think that there is no reference of "20 years" in the question so this option is out of scope.....
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Tue May 10, 2016 11:59 pm
Looking at it now, E makes sense
Join the discussion