BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

collection of tough problems from G PREP - 35

Expert replies
by abhasjha » Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:28 am
JASON'S SALARY AND KAREN'S SALARY WERE EACH P PERCENT GREATER IN 1998 THAN IN 1995. WHAT IS THE VALUE OF P?

1. IN 1995 KAREN'S SALARY WAS 2,000 GREATER THAN JASON'S

2. IN 1998 KAREN'S SALARY WAS 2,400 GREATER THAN JASON'S
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by shashank.ism » Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:10 am
abhasjha wrote:JASON'S SALARY AND KAREN'S SALARY WERE EACH P PERCENT GREATER IN 1998 THAN IN 1995. WHAT IS THE VALUE OF P?

1. IN 1995 KAREN'S SALARY WAS 2,000 GREATER THAN JASON'S

2. IN 1998 KAREN'S SALARY WAS 2,400 GREATER THAN JASON'S
Ans is C
My Websites:
www.mba.webmaggu.com - India's social Network for MBA Aspirants

www.deal.webmaggu.com -India's online discount, coupon, free stuff informer.

www.dictionary.webmaggu.com - A compact free online dictionary with images.

Nothing is Impossible, even Impossible says I'm possible.
Join the discussion

by harsh.champ » Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:10 am
abhasjha wrote:JASON'S SALARY AND KAREN'S SALARY WERE EACH P PERCENT GREATER IN 1998 THAN IN 1995. WHAT IS THE VALUE OF P?

1. IN 1995 KAREN'S SALARY WAS 2,000 GREATER THAN JASON'S

2. IN 1998 KAREN'S SALARY WAS 2,400 GREATER THAN JASON'S
Let salary ke K and J resp in 95.
In 98 (P+100/P)xK and (P+100/P)xJ resp.
1:- K= 2000 + J .insuff.
2:-(P+100/P)xK =(P+100/P)xJ +2400 insuff

Combining, 2 eqns, 3 variables. insuff. E.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Join the discussion

by ajith » Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:17 am
abhasjha wrote:JASON'S SALARY AND KAREN'S SALARY WERE EACH P PERCENT GREATER IN 1998 THAN IN 1995. WHAT IS THE VALUE OF P?

1. IN 1995 KAREN'S SALARY WAS 2,000 GREATER THAN JASON'S

2. IN 1998 KAREN'S SALARY WAS 2,400 GREATER THAN JASON'S
Say initial salary of Jason was j and that of Karen was k

1. k-j = 2000 is not sufficient
2. k(1+p/100) - j(1+p/100) = 2400
=> (k-j) (1+p/100) = 2400
Insufficient

Combining, 2000*(1+p/100) =2400

good enough to find out p
C
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion