BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Co-ordinate Geometry~~

Expert replies
by apoorva.srivastva » Sat Feb 20, 2010 2:07 am
line m and n pass through point (1,2). Is the slope of m greater than the slope of n?

1.) the x-intercept of m is greater than 1 and that of n is less than 1

2.) the y-intercept of m = 4 and that of n = (-2)

OA is D

kindly explains to solve st1 algebraically!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by thephoenix » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:11 am
apoorva.srivastva wrote:line m and n pass through point (1,2). Is the slope of m greater than the slope of n?

1.) the x-intercept of m is greater than 1 and that of n is less than 1

2.) the y-intercept of m = 4 and that of n = (-2)

OA is D

kindly explains to solve st1 algebraically!!

slope is nothing but the angle a lin subtends to Xaxis its the angle from X axis towards Y axis

s1) the two line will be as attched

clearly slope of m> slope of n
s2) the two line will be as attached

clearly slope of m>slope n
Attachments
slope.doc
(26 KiB) Downloaded 136 times
Join the discussion

by girish3131 » Sat Feb 20, 2010 5:29 am
@Apoorva


Acc to me, ans is either C or E (will confirm tmrw b/w them)

but am damn sure that Ans can't be D

U to plz check again.

Thanks!
Join the discussion

by harsh.champ » Sat Feb 20, 2010 5:52 am
apoorva.srivastva wrote:line m and n pass through point (1,2). Is the slope of m greater than the slope of n?

1.) the x-intercept of m is greater than 1 and that of n is less than 1

2.) the y-intercept of m = 4 and that of n = (-2)

OA is D

kindly explains to solve st1 algebraically!!
Here is the algebraic explanation:-
Let the line be y=mx +c and y=nx+d
Now putting point(1,2) we get
2=m+c and 2 = n+d
or c=2-m and d=2-n


Statement 1:- x-intercept means y=0
For m we have x= -c/m > 1
For n we have x= -d/n<1
Putting values of c and d from above,we have
(m-2)/m >1 and (n-2)/n < 1
Transposing 1 on the L.H.S.,we get
=>-2/m > 0 and -2/n <0

Since we don't know whether m and n are both +ve or both -ve or have alternate signs we can't tell anything.
Hence,the statement is insufficient.

I hope the above algebraic explanation helps. :)
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Join the discussion

by apoorva.srivastva » Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:54 am
girish3131 wrote:@Apoorva


Acc to me, ans is either C or E (will confirm tmrw b/w them)

but am damn sure that Ans can't be D

U to plz check again.

Thanks!
Girish i checked it bro..OA is D :)
Join the discussion

by apoorva.srivastva » Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:57 am
@ harsh...i too feel the st1 is insufficient!!
st2 is sufficient

@ girish....for me the OA should be B!!

someone can u please diagnose the this particular DS ;)
Join the discussion

by harsh.champ » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:27 am
apoorva.srivastva wrote:@ harsh...i too feel the st1 is insufficient!!
st2 is sufficient

@ girish....for me the OA should be B!!

someone can u please diagnose the this particular DS ;)
line m and n pass through point (1,2). Is the slope of m greater than the slope of n?

1.) the x-intercept of m is greater than 1 and that of n is less than 1

2.) the y-intercept of m = 4 and that of n = (-2)


Ok.I will show it step-by-step
Let the line be y=mx +c and y=nx+d
Now putting point(1,2) we get
2=m+c and 2 = n+d
or c=2-m and d=2-n

From St 2:-
the y-intercept(means x=0) of m = 4,hence we have c = 4
Also,y-intercept of n = (-2) ,hence we have d = -2
But,still we don't know about their slopes m and n(we only have their intercepts c and d)
Hence St 2 is insufficient.

So, the answer cannot be B.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Join the discussion

by harsh.champ » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:30 am
apoorva.srivastva wrote:
someone can u please diagnose the this particular DS ;)
Now I am posting the soln. approach that I think you might have taken:-

2=m+c and 2 = n+d
or c=2-m and d=2-n

the y-intercept of m = 4,hence we have -c/m = 4(This is when x-intercept is 4)
=>c=-4m
Also,y-intercept of n = (-2) ,hence we have -d/n = -2(This is when x-intercept is -2)
=>d=2n
Putting values of c and d from above,we have
c=2 - m and c=-4m
=>m= -2/3
Also,d=2-n and d=2n
=>n=2/3
Hence,we get the slopes
.
I think when you solved the 2nd statement ,the brain did not switch from x-intercept mode to y-intercept mode and hence you solved it by the incorrect method as I have shown.

I hope now you understand the trap in the question.

Hope this illustration will help u apoorva to diagnose this DS. :)
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Join the discussion

by kstv » Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:51 am
The lines m and n insertect at (1,2).

(1) m intersect the x axis at > 1 , say (2,0) . It has a - ve slope.

Line n passes the point (1,2) and intersect x axis at , 1 , say 0.5. It hass +ve slope.

Sufficient.

(2) the y intercept of m = 4 and that of n is -2 .

If two points are known the eq. y = mx +c can be solved.

Sufficient
Join the discussion