BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

co-ordinate geo

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by rajataga » Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:07 am
IMO E

each statement provides us the information that it is perpendicular to the X axis, however no information is provided about line m, except that it passes through (1,-1)
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:18 am
pls explain
Join the discussion

by rajataga » Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:57 am
Now the question asks you to determine whether the 2 lines are perpendicular to each other.

that means, you should be able to find out if the angle between the 2 lines is 90 or not.

Now to find the slope of a line, you need atleast two points on the line. You have 3 for line k, but only one point of line m...Hence you can never find out the slope of line m, and hence, the angle it makes with line k.

Hence, E
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Tue Jan 06, 2009 8:52 am
OA is E.. i am looking for better explanation. I thought the way, as per upper post., but was doubting my reasoning was right.
Any alternate explanation????????????

1 more ques.
Can any1 tell
wht is the product of slopes when lines are perpendicular ( i think it is -1)
wht is the product of slopes when lines are parallel ( i think same slope)
can any1 confirm ?
Join the discussion

by vikz_316 » Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:04 am
Why dont you try plotting the points.

With the info given, you would be able to plot only 1 line for k, but many lines for n. Hence not sufficient. I hope this helps.
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:09 am
thanks all........
pls also explain my ques above regardin product of slopes
Join the discussion

by vikz_316 » Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:23 am
for perpendicular lines, m1 * m2 = -1
for parallel lines, m1=m2, hence the square(yet to come across a problem where this is asked though)

Another tip,
To find a slope of a line, just express the line as y=mx + c. Slope will be the value of m. Dont forget, there should be no coefficient for the variable y.
Hence, slope of ax+by+c = 0 is (-a/b)
and the line perpendicular to it will be (b/a)
The equation of the perpendicular line can be written as bx-ay+k = 0
Hope I did not confuse you.
Join the discussion