BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Clean Air Act

Expert replies
by codesnooker » Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:56 pm
Since the passage of the state’s Clean Air Act ten years ago, the level of industrial pollutants in the air has fallen by an average of 18 percent. This suggests that the restrictions on industry embodied in the act have worked effectively. However, during the same period the state has also suffered through a period of economic decline. The number of businesses in the state has fallen by 10 percent, and the number of workers employed has fallen by 12 percent. It is probable that the business decline, rather than the regulations in the act, is responsible for at least half of the decline in the pollution.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage above?

A. During the last ten years, economic conditions in the nation as a whole have been worse than those within the state.
B. Amendments to the Clean Air Act that were enacted six years ago have substantially strengthened its restrictions on industrial air pollution.
C. Of the businesses that ceased operating in the state during the last ten years, only 5 percent were engaged in air-polluting industries.
D. Several large corporations left the state during the last ten years partly in order to avoid compliance with the Clean Air Act.
E. Due to its small budget, the state office charged with enforcement of the Clean Air Act has prosecuted only two violators of the law since its passage.

OA after some discussion. Please state the reason for your selected choice.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Sher1 » Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:15 pm
C. Of the businesses that ceased operating in the state during the last ten years, only 5 percent were engaged in air-polluting industries.

I think this is the answer. If only 5% are polluting, then the majority of the reduction in pollution came from restriction not from recession.
Join the discussion

by codesnooker » Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:35 pm
Sher1 wrote:C. Of the businesses that ceased operating in the state during the last ten years, only 5 percent were engaged in air-polluting industries.

I think this is the answer. If only 5% are polluting, then the majority of the reduction in pollution came from restriction not from recession.
Why not (B) or (D)?
Join the discussion

by Edwin1982 » Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:13 pm
I was thinking between C or D?, but chose D.

Conclusion: It is probable that the business decline, rather than the regulations in the act, is responsible for at least half of the decline in the pollution.


D says avoiding Clean Air Act, not business decline lead to pollution decline.
Join the discussion

by mikeCoolBoy » Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:24 pm
IMO C, I agree with Sher1
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Fri May 13, 2016 11:27 pm
Guys can anyone give a decent reason why C is not right.
Join the discussion