BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Clean Air Act

Expert replies
by codesnooker » Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:56 pm
Since the passage of the state’s Clean Air Act ten years ago, the level of industrial pollutants in the air has fallen by an average of 18 percent. This suggests that the restrictions on industry embodied in the act have worked effectively. However, during the same period the state has also suffered through a period of economic decline. The number of businesses in the state has fallen by 10 percent, and the number of workers employed has fallen by 12 percent. It is probable that the business decline, rather than the regulations in the act, is responsible for at least half of the decline in the pollution.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage above?

A. During the last ten years, economic conditions in the nation as a whole have been worse than those within the state.
B. Amendments to the Clean Air Act that were enacted six years ago have substantially strengthened its restrictions on industrial air pollution.
C. Of the businesses that ceased operating in the state during the last ten years, only 5 percent were engaged in air-polluting industries.
D. Several large corporations left the state during the last ten years partly in order to avoid compliance with the Clean Air Act.
E. Due to its small budget, the state office charged with enforcement of the Clean Air Act has prosecuted only two violators of the law since its passage.

OA after some discussion. Please state the reason for your selected choice.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Sher1 » Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:15 pm
C. Of the businesses that ceased operating in the state during the last ten years, only 5 percent were engaged in air-polluting industries.

I think this is the answer. If only 5% are polluting, then the majority of the reduction in pollution came from restriction not from recession.
Join the discussion

by codesnooker » Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:35 pm
Sher1 wrote:C. Of the businesses that ceased operating in the state during the last ten years, only 5 percent were engaged in air-polluting industries.

I think this is the answer. If only 5% are polluting, then the majority of the reduction in pollution came from restriction not from recession.
Why not (B) or (D)?
Join the discussion

by Edwin1982 » Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:13 pm
I was thinking between C or D?, but chose D.

Conclusion: It is probable that the business decline, rather than the regulations in the act, is responsible for at least half of the decline in the pollution.


D says avoiding Clean Air Act, not business decline lead to pollution decline.
Join the discussion

by mikeCoolBoy » Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:24 pm
IMO C, I agree with Sher1
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Fri May 13, 2016 11:27 pm
Guys can anyone give a decent reason why C is not right.
Join the discussion