Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

City Y last year

Expert replies
by Vemuri » Tue Mar 17, 2009 6:40 pm
In City Y last year, what was the ratio of the number of commuters who rode buses to the number of commuters who rode trains?

1. In City Y last year, 50,000 commuters rode trains and 48,000 commuters rode buses.
2. In City Y last year, if the number of commuters who rode trains had been 20% greater, the number of commuters who rode trains would have been 125% of the number of commuters who rode buses.

The OA is A. Statement 1 clearly provides the missing information to answer the question. I thought statement 2 was sufficient as well. Let me explain what I did.

If the # of commuters by train were x & of commuters by bus were y, then statement 2 is saying,

1.2x = 1.25y

from the above equation, we can get the ratio of commuters by bus to commuters by train.

y/x = 1.2/1.25 --> Sufficient.

Isn't the answer supposed to be D?

Am I doing something wrong?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cramya » Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Unless I am missing something which is possible I would go with D too. I must be missing a trick in the wording if its really A
Join the discussion

Re: City Y last year

by serenity09 » Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:37 pm
Vemuri wrote:In City Y last year, what was the ratio of the number of
If the # of commuters by train were x & of commuters by bus were y, then statement 2 is saying,

1.2x = 1.25y

from the above equation, we can get the ratio of commuters by bus to commuters by train.

y/x = 1.2/1.25 --> Sufficient.

Isn't the answer supposed to be D?

Am I doing something wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This looks right to me as well. What is the source of this question??
Join the discussion

Re: City Y last year

by Vemuri » Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:42 pm
Source is Princeton Review GMAT guide. Its a classroom question with no answer. I had it marked as A (I guess from what the instructor explained). Maybe it was my mistake marking it.
Join the discussion

Re: City Y last year

by shibal » Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:38 pm
Vemuri wrote:In City Y last year, what was the ratio of the number of commuters who rode buses to the number of commuters who rode trains?

1. In City Y last year, 50,000 commuters rode trains and 48,000 commuters rode buses.
2. In City Y last year, if the number of commuters who rode trains had been 20% greater, the number of commuters who rode trains would have been 125% of the number of commuters who rode buses.

The OA is A. Statement 1 clearly provides the missing information to answer the question. I thought statement 2 was sufficient as well. Let me explain what I did.

If the # of commuters by train were x & of commuters by bus were y, then statement 2 is saying,

1.2x = 1.25y

from the above equation, we can get the ratio of commuters by bus to commuters by train.

y/x = 1.2/1.25 --> Sufficient.

Isn't the answer supposed to be D?

Am I doing something wrong?
C all the way =P.... however 125% should be 2.25 not 1.25...
Join the discussion